head to head · open source
huginn vs m3
huginn has 50,269 GitHub stars, 4,339 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped yesterday. m3 has 4,909 stars, 460 forks, 222 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. huginn leads on adoption by 924% (50,269 vs 4,909 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; m3 is written in Go under Apache-2.0. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, m3 9%. huginn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| huginn | m3 | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 4.9K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Ruby | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.3K | ⑂ 460 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick huginn if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick m3 if
- You want the m3 feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and m3 fits your workflow better
About huginn
What is Huginn? Huginn is a system for building agents that perform automated tasks for you online. They can read the web, watch for events, and take actions on your behalf. Huginn's Agents create and consume events, propagating them along a directed graph. Think of it as a hackable version of IFTTT or Zapier on your own server. You always know who has your data. You do. Here are some of the things that you can do with Huginn: Track the weather and get an email when it's going to rain (or snow) tomorrow ("Don't forget your umbrella!") List terms that you care about and receive email when their occurrence on…
read the full huginn overview →
About m3
M3 [![GoDoc][doc img]][doc] [![Build Status][ci img]][ci] [![FOSSA Status][fossa img]][fossa] Distributed TSDB and Query Engine, Prometheus Sidecar, Metrics Aggregator, and more such as Graphite storage and query engine. Table of Contents More Information Install Dependencies Usage Contributing More Information Documentation Contributing Slack Forum (Google Group) Community Meetings You can find recordings of past meetups here: . Install Dependencies The simplest and quickest way to try M3 is to use Docker, read the M3 quickstart section for other options. This example uses jq to format the output of API calls…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is huginn or m3 more popular?
huginn has 50,269 GitHub stars and m3 has 4,909. huginn has the larger community by that measure.
Are huginn and m3 free?
Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and m3 under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between huginn and m3?
huginn is written in Ruby and m3 in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, huginn or m3?
Choose huginn if you want the larger community (50,269 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose m3 if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.