head to head · open source
huginn vs log
huginn has 49,969 GitHub stars, 4,299 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped today. log has 3,393 stars, 102 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. huginn leads on adoption by 1,373% (49,969 vs 3,393 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; log is written in Go under MIT. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, log 3%. huginn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| huginn | log | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 3.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Ruby | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.3K | ⑂ 102 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick huginn if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick log if
- You want the log feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and log fits your workflow better
About huginn
Huginn is an open source system for building agents that perform automated tasks online, written in Ruby and released under the MIT license. Its agents read the web, watch for events, and take actions on the user's behalf. Internally, agents create and consume events that propagate along a directed graph, which means one agent's output becomes another agent's input and a chain of small steps can be composed into a larger workflow. The project lives in the Ruby ecosystem and is distributed as an official Docker image or installed locally from a forked repository.
read the full huginn overview →
About log
Log A minimal and colorful Go logging library. 🪵 It provides a leveled structured human readable logger with a small API. Unlike [standard log ][stdlog], the Charm logger provides customizable colorful human readable logging with batteries included. Uses [Lip Gloss][lipgloss] to style and colorize the output. Colorful, human readable format. Ability to customize the time stamp format. Skips caller frames and marks function as helpers. Leveled logging. Text, JSON, and Logfmt formatters. Store and retrieve logger in and from context. Slog handler. Standard log adapter. Usage Use go get to download the dependency. …
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is huginn or log more popular?
huginn has 49,969 GitHub stars and log has 3,393. huginn has the larger community by that measure.
Are huginn and log free?
Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and log under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between huginn and log?
huginn is written in Ruby and log in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, huginn or log?
Choose huginn if you want the larger community (49,969 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose log if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.