head to head · open source

huginn vs lindb

huginn has 49,969 GitHub stars, 4,299 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped today. lindb has 3,064 stars, 284 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. huginn leads on adoption by 1,531% (49,969 vs 3,064 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; lindb is written in Go under Apache-2.0. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, lindb 9%. huginn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

huginn ★ 50K lindb ★ 3.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

huginn lindb
GitHub stars ★ 50K ★ 3.1K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Ruby Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-07-27
Forks ⑂ 4.3K ⑂ 284
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick huginn if

  • You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full huginn profile →

pick lindb if

  • You want the lindb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and lindb fits your workflow better

full lindb profile →

About huginn

Huginn is an open source system for building agents that perform automated tasks online, written in Ruby and released under the MIT license. Its agents read the web, watch for events, and take actions on the user's behalf. Internally, agents create and consume events that propagate along a directed graph, which means one agent's output becomes another agent's input and a chain of small steps can be composed into a larger workflow. The project lives in the Ruby ecosystem and is distributed as an official Docker image or installed locally from a forked repository.

read the full huginn overview →

About lindb

English 简体中文 日本語 What is LinDB? LinDB is an open source Time Series Database which provides high performance, high availability and horizontal scalability. Key features Guide Quick start Design Architecture Admin UI Build Prerequisites To build LinDB from source you require the following on your system. Go =1.21 Make tool Yarn Get the code Build from source To build only LinDB core.(without web console) To build both LinDB core and frontend. Test Access web interface(for developer) Start the node.js app to view LinDB web interface in dev mode. You can access the LinDB web interface on your localhost port 3000 Arc…

read the full lindb overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

huginn vs Uptime Kuma huginn vs worldmonitor huginn vs NetData huginn vs Grafana huginn vs Sentry huginn vs SigNoz huginn vs Grafana Loki huginn vs beszel huginn vs cilium huginn vs Apache SkyWalking huginn vs jaeger huginn vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is huginn or lindb more popular?

huginn has 49,969 GitHub stars and lindb has 3,064. huginn has the larger community by that measure.

Are huginn and lindb free?

Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and lindb under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between huginn and lindb?

huginn is written in Ruby and lindb in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, huginn or lindb?

Choose huginn if you want the larger community (49,969 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lindb if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.