head to head · open source
huginn vs gofr
huginn has 49,967 GitHub stars, 4,298 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. gofr has 20,916 stars, 1,759 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped yesterday. huginn leads on adoption by 139% (49,967 vs 20,916 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; gofr is written in Go under Apache-2.0. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, gofr 8%. gofr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| huginn | gofr | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 21K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Ruby | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.3K | ⑂ 1.8K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick huginn if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick gofr if
- You want the gofr feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and gofr fits your workflow better
About huginn
Huginn is an open source system for building agents that perform automated tasks online, written in Ruby and released under the MIT license. Its agents read the web, watch for events, and take actions on the user's behalf. Internally, agents create and consume events that propagate along a directed graph, which means one agent's output becomes another agent's input and a chain of small steps can be composed into a larger workflow. The project lives in the Ruby ecosystem and is distributed as an official Docker image or installed locally from a forked repository.
read the full huginn overview →
About gofr
GoFr is an opinionated Go framework for building microservices, aimed at Go developers and platform teams who want HTTP, gRPC, data access and observability built in rather than assembled from separate libraries.
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is huginn or gofr more popular?
huginn has 49,967 GitHub stars and gofr has 20,916. huginn has the larger community by that measure.
Are huginn and gofr free?
Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and gofr under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between huginn and gofr?
huginn is written in Ruby and gofr in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, huginn or gofr?
Choose huginn if you want the larger community (49,967 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gofr if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.