head to head · open source
huginn vs evo
huginn has 50,269 GitHub stars, 4,339 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped yesterday. evo has 4,354 stars, 803 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. huginn leads on adoption by 1,055% (50,269 vs 4,354 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; evo is written in Python under GPL-3.0. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, evo 18%. huginn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| huginn | evo | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Ruby | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.3K | ⑂ 803 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick huginn if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick evo if
- You want the evo feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and evo fits your workflow better
About huginn
What is Huginn? Huginn is a system for building agents that perform automated tasks for you online. They can read the web, watch for events, and take actions on your behalf. Huginn's Agents create and consume events, propagating them along a directed graph. Think of it as a hackable version of IFTTT or Zapier on your own server. You always know who has your data. You do. Here are some of the things that you can do with Huginn: Track the weather and get an email when it's going to rain (or snow) tomorrow ("Don't forget your umbrella!") List terms that you care about and receive email when their occurrence on…
read the full huginn overview →
About evo
evo Python package for the evaluation of odometry and SLAM This package provides executables and a small library for handling, evaluating and comparing the trajectory output of odometry and SLAM algorithms. Supported trajectory formats: 'TUM' trajectory files 'KITTI' pose files 'EuRoC MAV' (.csv groundtruth and TUM trajectory file) ROS and ROS2 bagfile with geometry msgs/PoseStamped , geometry msgs/TransformStamped , geometry msgs/PoseWithCovarianceStamped , geometry msgs/PointStamped or nav msgs/Odometry topics or TF messages See here for more infos about the formats. Why? evo has several advantages over other…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is huginn or evo more popular?
huginn has 50,269 GitHub stars and evo has 4,354. huginn has the larger community by that measure.
Are huginn and evo free?
Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and evo under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between huginn and evo?
huginn is written in Ruby and evo in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, huginn or evo?
Choose huginn if you want the larger community (50,269 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose evo if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.