head to head · open source
huginn vs airframe
huginn has 50,269 GitHub stars, 4,339 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped yesterday. airframe has 666 stars, 67 forks, 105 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. huginn leads on adoption by 7,448% (50,269 vs 666 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; airframe is written in Scala under Apache-2.0. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, airframe 10%. huginn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| huginn | airframe | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 666 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Ruby | Scala |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.3K | ⑂ 67 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick huginn if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick airframe if
- You want the airframe feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Scala
- You evaluated both and airframe fits your workflow better
About huginn
What is Huginn? Huginn is a system for building agents that perform automated tasks for you online. They can read the web, watch for events, and take actions on your behalf. Huginn's Agents create and consume events, propagating them along a directed graph. Think of it as a hackable version of IFTTT or Zapier on your own server. You always know who has your data. You do. Here are some of the things that you can do with Huginn: Track the weather and get an email when it's going to rain (or snow) tomorrow ("Don't forget your umbrella!") List terms that you care about and receive email when their occurrence on…
read the full huginn overview →
About airframe
[![Gitter Chat][gitter badge]][gitter link] [![CI Status][gha badge]][gha link] [![scala index][sindex badge]][sindex link] [![maven central][central badge]][central link] [circleci badge]: [circleci link]: [gha badge]: [gha link]: [gitter badge]: [gitter link]: [coverall badge]: [coverall link]: [sindex badge]: [sindex link]: [central badge]: [central link]: Airframe is essential building blocks for developing applications in Scala, including logging, object serialization using JSON or MessagePack, dependency injection, http server/client with RPC support, functional testing with AirSpec, etc. Resources…
read the full airframe overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is huginn or airframe more popular?
huginn has 50,269 GitHub stars and airframe has 666. huginn has the larger community by that measure.
Are huginn and airframe free?
Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and airframe under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between huginn and airframe?
huginn is written in Ruby and airframe in Scala. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, huginn or airframe?
Choose huginn if you want the larger community (50,269 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose airframe if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.