head to head · open source

haystack vs werf

haystack has 26,531 GitHub stars, 3,144 forks, 143 open issues and last shipped yesterday. werf has 4,721 stars, 239 forks, 30 open issues and last shipped yesterday. haystack leads on adoption by 462% (26,531 vs 4,721 stars). haystack is written in Python under Apache-2.0; werf is written in Go under Apache-2.0. haystack has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, werf 5%. haystack was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

haystack ★ 27K werf ★ 4.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

haystack werf
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 4.7K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.1K ⑂ 239
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick haystack if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full haystack profile →

pick werf if

  • You want the werf feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and werf fits your workflow better

full werf profile →

About haystack

Haystack is an open source AI orchestration framework written in Python under the Apache 2.0 licence, for building context engineered, production ready large language model applications as modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation, and it is aimed at developers and teams building scalable agents, retrieval augmented generation, multimodal applications, semantic search, question answering, and conversational systems.

read the full haystack overview →

About werf

werf is a CNCF Sandbox command line tool, written in Go and licensed under Apache 2.0, that implements full cycle CI/CD to Kubernetes for teams that already build container images and deploy with Helm but want one tool to carry an application from build through deploy, release artifacts and container registry cleanup.

read the full werf overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs rancher conductor vs xxl-job compose vs prefect uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

haystack vs compose haystack vs conductor haystack vs xxl-job haystack vs gitleaks haystack vs Kestra haystack vs rancher haystack vs Prefect haystack vs Archon haystack vs Temporal haystack vs rowboat haystack vs Trigger haystack vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is haystack or werf more popular?

haystack has 26,531 GitHub stars and werf has 4,721. haystack has the larger community by that measure.

Are haystack and werf free?

Both are open source. haystack is licensed under Apache-2.0 and werf under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between haystack and werf?

haystack is written in Python and werf in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, haystack or werf?

Choose haystack if you want the larger community (26,531 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose werf if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.