head to head · open source

Grok Build vs Omnigent

Grok Build has 26,903 GitHub stars, 5,067 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Omnigent has 10,106 stars, 1,601 forks, 1,315 open issues and last shipped today. Grok Build leads on adoption by 166% (26,903 vs 10,106 stars). Grok Build is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; Omnigent is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Grok Build has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, Omnigent 16%. Omnigent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grok Build ★ 27K Omnigent ★ 10K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grok Build Omnigent
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 10K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Python
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grok Build if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grok Build profile →

pick Omnigent if

  • You want the Omnigent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Omnigent fits your workflow better

full Omnigent profile →

About Grok Build

Grok Build is a terminal based AI coding agent developed by SpaceXAI, distributed as the grok CLI/TUI. It operates as a fullscreen, mouse interactive interface that integrates with the user’s codebase to perform code editing, command execution, web search, and long running task orchestration. The project lives in the Rust ecosystem and is licensed under Apache 2.0.

read the full Grok Build overview →

About Omnigent

Omnigent is an open source AI agent framework and meta harness in the Developer Tools and AI Assisted Coding ecosystem. It provides a common orchestration layer over Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Hermes, Pi, and custom YAML agents. The Python project uses the Apache 2.0 license and combines different harnesses without rewriting the workflow.

read the full Omnigent overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

Grok Build vs OpenCode Grok Build vs pi Grok Build vs OpenHands Grok Build vs Paperclip Grok Build vs rtk Grok Build vs Orca Grok Build vs codegraph Grok Build vs Cline Grok Build vs Aider Grok Build vs Continue Grok Build vs Tabby Grok Build vs T3 Code

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok Build or Omnigent more popular?

Grok Build has 26,903 GitHub stars and Omnigent has 10,106. Grok Build has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grok Build and Omnigent free?

Both are open source. Grok Build is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Omnigent under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grok Build and Omnigent?

Grok Build is written in Rust and Omnigent in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grok Build or Omnigent?

Choose Grok Build if you want the larger community (26,903 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Omnigent if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.