head to head · open source

Grafana vs wgcloud

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars, 14,752 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped today. wgcloud has 5,183 stars, 910 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. Grafana leads on adoption by 1,382% (76,792 vs 5,183 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; wgcloud is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, wgcloud 18%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana ★ 77K wgcloud ★ 5.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana wgcloud
GitHub stars ★ 77K ★ 5.2K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-04
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 910
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana if

  • You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana profile →

pick wgcloud if

  • You want the wgcloud feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and wgcloud fits your workflow better

full wgcloud profile →

About Grafana

Grafana is an open source observability platform for visualizing metrics, logs, and traces across diverse data sources. It runs in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, designed for teams needing unified visibility into system behavior without vendor lock in. Built with TypeScript and Go, it provides a composable architecture that integrates with existing toolchains.

read the full Grafana overview →

About wgcloud

WGCLOUD is an open source, Java based distributed monitoring system for Linux and mixed OS server fleets, aimed at operations teams that want host, service, container, network and middleware monitoring from one server plus agent deployment instead of assembling several tools.

read the full wgcloud overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana vs Uptime Kuma Grafana vs worldmonitor Grafana vs NetData Grafana vs huginn Grafana vs Sentry Grafana vs SigNoz Grafana vs Grafana Loki Grafana vs beszel Grafana vs cilium Grafana vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana vs jaeger Grafana vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or wgcloud more popular?

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars and wgcloud has 5,183. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana and wgcloud free?

Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and wgcloud under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana and wgcloud?

Grafana is written in TypeScript and wgcloud in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana or wgcloud?

Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (76,792 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose wgcloud if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.