head to head · open source

Grafana vs Wachd

Grafana has 76,791 GitHub stars, 14,749 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Wachd has 38 stars, 5 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Grafana leads on adoption by 201,982% (76,791 vs 38 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Wachd is written in Go under a custom or non-standard licence. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, Wachd 13%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana ★ 77K Wachd ★ 38 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana Wachd
GitHub stars ★ 77K ★ 38
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 5
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana if

  • You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana profile →

pick Wachd if

  • You want the Wachd feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Wachd fits your workflow better

full Wachd profile →

About Grafana

Grafana is an open source observability platform for visualizing metrics, logs, and traces across diverse data sources. It runs in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, designed for teams needing unified visibility into system behavior without vendor lock in. Built with TypeScript and Go, it provides a composable architecture that integrates with existing toolchains.

read the full Grafana overview →

About Wachd

Wachd is a self hosted, air gapped alert intelligence platform that uses AI to turn monitoring alerts from tools such as Grafana, Datadog, Prometheus, and Splunk into a plain English root cause diagnosis for the on call engineer.

read the full Wachd overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana vs Uptime Kuma Grafana vs worldmonitor Grafana vs NetData Grafana vs huginn Grafana vs Sentry Grafana vs SigNoz Grafana vs Grafana Loki Grafana vs beszel Grafana vs cilium Grafana vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana vs jaeger Grafana vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or Wachd more popular?

Grafana has 76,791 GitHub stars and Wachd has 38. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana and Wachd free?

Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and Wachd has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Grafana and Wachd?

Grafana is written in TypeScript and Wachd in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana or Wachd?

Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (76,791 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Wachd if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.