head to head · open source
Grafana vs HyperDX
Grafana has 76,791 GitHub stars, 14,749 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped yesterday. HyperDX has 9,897 stars, 469 forks, 187 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Grafana leads on adoption by 676% (76,791 vs 9,897 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; HyperDX is written in TypeScript under MIT. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, HyperDX 5%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 5 topic tags (alerting, analytics, dashboard, metrics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Grafana | HyperDX | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 77K | ★ 9.9K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 15K | ⑂ 469 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Grafana if
- You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick HyperDX if
- You want the HyperDX feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and HyperDX fits your workflow better
About Grafana
Grafana is an open source observability platform for visualizing metrics, logs, and traces across diverse data sources. It runs in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, designed for teams needing unified visibility into system behavior without vendor lock in. Built with TypeScript and Go, it provides a composable architecture that integrates with existing toolchains.
read the full Grafana overview →
About HyperDX
HyperDX is an open source observability platform that unifies session replays, logs, metrics, traces, and errors. It is built on ClickHouse and OpenTelemetry, and it is positioned as a core component of ClickStack. The project lives in the open source infrastructure and operations ecosystem, especially around log management, application monitoring, frontend monitoring, Kubernetes, and APM.
read the full HyperDX overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana or HyperDX more popular?
Grafana has 76,791 GitHub stars and HyperDX has 9,897. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.
Are Grafana and HyperDX free?
Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and HyperDX under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Grafana and HyperDX?
Grafana is written in TypeScript and HyperDX in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Grafana or HyperDX?
Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (76,791 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose HyperDX if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.