head to head · open source

Grafana vs databuff

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars, 14,752 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped today. databuff has 683 stars, 136 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Grafana leads on adoption by 11,143% (76,792 vs 683 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; databuff is written in Java under AGPL-3.0. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, databuff 20%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana ★ 77K databuff ★ 683 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana databuff
GitHub stars ★ 77K ★ 683
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 136
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana if

  • You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana profile →

pick databuff if

  • You want the databuff feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and databuff fits your workflow better

full databuff profile →

About Grafana

Grafana is an open source observability platform for visualizing metrics, logs, and traces across diverse data sources. It runs in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, designed for teams needing unified visibility into system behavior without vendor lock in. Built with TypeScript and Go, it provides a composable architecture that integrates with existing toolchains.

read the full Grafana overview →

About databuff

DataBuff — AI Native APM Built On Opentelemetry Mission: build the strongest OpenTelemetry APM backend AI native · OTLP native · multi agent out of the box · self hosted traces, metrics, topology Live Demo · Documentation · Open Source APM · 简体中文 · Community AI multi agent troubleshooting · Service health · Call graph topology Keywords : AI Native APM · OpenTelemetry APM · OTLP Backend · Multi Agent · Distributed Tracing · AIOps · Open Source APM · MCP · Self Hosted Observability What is DataBuff DataBuff is an AI native APM backend built on Opentelemetry — ingest traces, metrics, and logs via OTLP, with full sta…

read the full databuff overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana vs Uptime Kuma Grafana vs worldmonitor Grafana vs NetData Grafana vs huginn Grafana vs Sentry Grafana vs SigNoz Grafana vs Grafana Loki Grafana vs beszel Grafana vs cilium Grafana vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana vs jaeger Grafana vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or databuff more popular?

Grafana has 76,792 GitHub stars and databuff has 683. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana and databuff free?

Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and databuff under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana and databuff?

Grafana is written in TypeScript and databuff in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana or databuff?

Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (76,792 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose databuff if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.