head to head · open source
Grafana vs codeburn
Grafana has 77,638 GitHub stars, 14,905 forks, 3,326 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codeburn has 11,664 stars, 903 forks, 45 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Grafana leads on adoption by 566% (77,638 vs 11,664 stars). Grafana is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; codeburn is written in TypeScript under MIT. Grafana has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, codeburn 8%. Grafana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Grafana | codeburn | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 78K | ★ 12K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 15K | ⑂ 903 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Grafana if
- You weight community size — 78K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick codeburn if
- You want the codeburn feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and codeburn fits your workflow better
About Grafana
The open source platform for monitoring and observability Grafana allows you to query, visualize, alert on and understand your metrics no matter where they are stored. Create, explore, and share dashboards with your team and foster a data driven culture: Visualizations: Fast and flexible client side graphs with a multitude of options. Panel plugins offer many different ways to visualize metrics and logs. Dynamic Dashboards: Create dynamic & reusable dashboards with template variables that appear as dropdowns at the top of the dashboard. Explore Metrics: Explore your data through ad hoc queries and dynamic…
read the full Grafana overview →
About codeburn
See where your AI spend goes. If CodeBurn shows you something your bill never did, star the repo so other developers find it, and consider sponsoring to keep 41 integrations honest. npx codeburn To keep it: npm install g codeburn or brew install codeburn . Needs Node.js 22.13+. Desktop app 0.9.25. The macOS builds are signed with a Developer ID and notarized by Apple. The problem Your bill gives you a month total. It does not break that down by project, by model or by task, and it does not show which part of it was wasted. Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and the rest each write a session file every time you use them…
read the full codeburn overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana or codeburn more popular?
Grafana has 77,638 GitHub stars and codeburn has 11,664. Grafana has the larger community by that measure.
Are Grafana and codeburn free?
Both are open source. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and codeburn under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Grafana and codeburn?
Grafana is written in TypeScript and codeburn in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Grafana or codeburn?
Choose Grafana if you want the larger community (77,638 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose codeburn if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.