head to head · open source

Grafana Loki vs logging-log4net

Grafana Loki has 28,917 GitHub stars, 4,115 forks, 1,620 open issues and last shipped yesterday. logging-log4net has 934 stars, 333 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Grafana Loki leads on adoption by 2,996% (28,917 vs 934 stars). Grafana Loki is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; logging-log4net is written in C# under Apache-2.0. Grafana Loki has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, logging-log4net 36%. Grafana Loki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana Loki ★ 29K logging-log4net ★ 934 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana Loki logging-log4net
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 934
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go C#
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 333
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana Loki if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana Loki profile →

pick logging-log4net if

  • You want the logging-log4net feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and logging-log4net fits your workflow better

full logging-log4net profile →

About Grafana Loki

Grafana Loki is a log aggregation system designed as the log oriented counterpart to Prometheus. It operates within the cloud native observability ecosystem, specifically targeting Kubernetes and containerized environments. Loki avoids expensive full text indexing by indexing only metadata labels attached to log streams, storing the raw log content in compressed form. This design choice makes Loki significantly simpler to operate and more cost effective than traditional log systems that index every word.

read the full Grafana Loki overview →

About logging-log4net

Apache log4net is a versatile, feature rich logging API and backend for .NET, distributed as the NuGet package log4net and developed as a subproject of the Apache Logging Services project — a fit for .NET developers and platform teams that need a stable, Apache licensed logging library rather than a commercial or single vendor offering.

read the full logging-log4net overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana Loki vs Uptime Kuma Grafana Loki vs worldmonitor Grafana Loki vs NetData Grafana Loki vs Grafana Grafana Loki vs huginn Grafana Loki vs Sentry Grafana Loki vs SigNoz Grafana Loki vs beszel Grafana Loki vs cilium Grafana Loki vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana Loki vs jaeger Grafana Loki vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or logging-log4net more popular?

Grafana Loki has 28,917 GitHub stars and logging-log4net has 934. Grafana Loki has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana Loki and logging-log4net free?

Both are open source. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and logging-log4net under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana Loki and logging-log4net?

Grafana Loki is written in Go and logging-log4net in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana Loki or logging-log4net?

Choose Grafana Loki if you want the larger community (28,917 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose logging-log4net if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.