head to head · open source
Grafana Loki vs laravel-http-logger
Grafana Loki has 29,120 GitHub stars, 4,173 forks, 1,620 open issues and last shipped yesterday. laravel-http-logger has 673 stars, 57 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. Grafana Loki leads on adoption by 4,227% (29,120 vs 673 stars). Grafana Loki is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; laravel-http-logger is written in PHP under MIT. Grafana Loki has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, laravel-http-logger 8%. Grafana Loki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Grafana Loki | laravel-http-logger | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 29K | ★ 673 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-22 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 57 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Grafana Loki if
- You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick laravel-http-logger if
- You want the laravel-http-logger feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and laravel-http-logger fits your workflow better
About Grafana Loki
Loki: like Prometheus, but for logs. Loki is a horizontally scalable, highly available, multi tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate. It does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream. Compared to other log aggregation systems, Loki: does not do full text indexing on logs. By storing compressed, unstructured logs and only indexing metadata, Loki is simpler to operate and cheaper to run. indexes and groups log streams using the same labels you’re already using with Prometheus, enabling you to…
read the full Grafana Loki overview →
About laravel-http-logger
Log HTTP requests This package adds a middleware which can log incoming requests to the default log. If anything goes wrong during a user's request, you'll still be able to access the original request data sent by that user. This log acts as an extra safety net for critical user submissions, such as forms that generate leads. Support us We invest a lot of resources into creating best in class open source packages. You can support us by buying one of our paid products. We highly appreciate you sending us a postcard from your hometown, mentioning which of our package(s) you are using. You'll find our address on…
read the full laravel-http-logger overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana Loki or laravel-http-logger more popular?
Grafana Loki has 29,120 GitHub stars and laravel-http-logger has 673. Grafana Loki has the larger community by that measure.
Are Grafana Loki and laravel-http-logger free?
Both are open source. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and laravel-http-logger under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Grafana Loki and laravel-http-logger?
Grafana Loki is written in Go and laravel-http-logger in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Grafana Loki or laravel-http-logger?
Choose Grafana Loki if you want the larger community (29,120 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose laravel-http-logger if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.