head to head · open source

Grafana Loki vs dozzle

Grafana Loki has 28,917 GitHub stars, 4,115 forks, 1,620 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dozzle has 14,434 stars, 619 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped today. Grafana Loki leads on adoption by 100% (28,917 vs 14,434 stars). Grafana Loki is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; dozzle is written in Go under MIT. Grafana Loki has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, dozzle 4%. dozzle was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana Loki ★ 29K dozzle ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana Loki dozzle
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 14K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 619
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana Loki if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana Loki profile →

pick dozzle if

  • You want the dozzle feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and dozzle fits your workflow better

full dozzle profile →

About Grafana Loki

Grafana Loki is a log aggregation system designed as the log oriented counterpart to Prometheus. It operates within the cloud native observability ecosystem, specifically targeting Kubernetes and containerized environments. Loki avoids expensive full text indexing by indexing only metadata labels attached to log streams, storing the raw log content in compressed form. This design choice makes Loki significantly simpler to operate and more cost effective than traditional log systems that index every word.

read the full Grafana Loki overview →

About dozzle

Dozzle is a lightweight, web based application for monitoring Docker logs in real time. It is written in Go and distributed under the MIT license, and it lives in the container and orchestration ecosystem alongside Docker, Docker Swarm and Kubernetes, which its topics and tagline both name. The project ships as a small container — roughly 7 MB compressed — and its user interface is built with Vue.js. It exposes a browser view over logs rather than writing them anywhere: the README states plainly that Dozzle stores no log files and exists purely for live log viewing.

read the full dozzle overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana Loki vs Uptime Kuma Grafana Loki vs worldmonitor Grafana Loki vs NetData Grafana Loki vs Grafana Grafana Loki vs huginn Grafana Loki vs Sentry Grafana Loki vs SigNoz Grafana Loki vs beszel Grafana Loki vs cilium Grafana Loki vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana Loki vs jaeger Grafana Loki vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or dozzle more popular?

Grafana Loki has 28,917 GitHub stars and dozzle has 14,434. Grafana Loki has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana Loki and dozzle free?

Both are open source. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and dozzle under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana Loki and dozzle?

Grafana Loki is written in Go and dozzle in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana Loki or dozzle?

Choose Grafana Loki if you want the larger community (28,917 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose dozzle if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.