head to head · open source
Grafana Loki vs claude-devtools
Grafana Loki has 29,120 GitHub stars, 4,173 forks, 1,620 open issues and last shipped yesterday. claude-devtools has 4,009 stars, 308 forks, 50 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Grafana Loki leads on adoption by 626% (29,120 vs 4,009 stars). Grafana Loki is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; claude-devtools is written in TypeScript under MIT. Grafana Loki has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, claude-devtools 8%. Grafana Loki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Grafana Loki | claude-devtools | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 29K | ★ 4.0K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-09-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 308 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Grafana Loki if
- You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick claude-devtools if
- You want the claude-devtools feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and claude-devtools fits your workflow better
About Grafana Loki
Loki: like Prometheus, but for logs. Loki is a horizontally scalable, highly available, multi tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate. It does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream. Compared to other log aggregation systems, Loki: does not do full text indexing on logs. By storing compressed, unstructured logs and only indexing metadata, Loki is simpler to operate and cheaper to run. indexes and groups log streams using the same labels you’re already using with Prometheus, enabling you to…
read the full Grafana Loki overview →
About claude-devtools
claude devtools Your Claude is coding blind. See everything it did. The debugging tool for Claude Code. Read session transcripts, inspect tool calls, track token usage — directly from the Claude Code logs on your machine. Your browser does not support the video tag. The Problem Claude Code started hiding what it does. Since v2.1.20, Claude Code replaced detailed output with opaque summaries. Read 3 files . Searched for 1 pattern . Edited 2 files . No file paths. No content. No line numbers. The community backlash was immediate. But the problem goes deeper than collapsed file paths: Thinking steps — Claude's…
read the full claude-devtools overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana Loki or claude-devtools more popular?
Grafana Loki has 29,120 GitHub stars and claude-devtools has 4,009. Grafana Loki has the larger community by that measure.
Are Grafana Loki and claude-devtools free?
Both are open source. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and claude-devtools under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Grafana Loki and claude-devtools?
Grafana Loki is written in Go and claude-devtools in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Grafana Loki or claude-devtools?
Choose Grafana Loki if you want the larger community (29,120 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose claude-devtools if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.