head to head · open source
Grafana Loki vs booklogr
Grafana Loki has 29,120 GitHub stars, 4,173 forks, 1,620 open issues and last shipped yesterday. booklogr has 637 stars, 37 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. Grafana Loki leads on adoption by 4,471% (29,120 vs 637 stars). Grafana Loki is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; booklogr is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. Grafana Loki has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, booklogr 6%. Grafana Loki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Grafana Loki | booklogr | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 29K | ★ 637 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 37 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Grafana Loki if
- You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick booklogr if
- You want the booklogr feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and booklogr fits your workflow better
About Grafana Loki
Loki: like Prometheus, but for logs. Loki is a horizontally scalable, highly available, multi tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate. It does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream. Compared to other log aggregation systems, Loki: does not do full text indexing on logs. By storing compressed, unstructured logs and only indexing metadata, Loki is simpler to operate and cheaper to run. indexes and groups log streams using the same labels you’re already using with Prometheus, enabling you to…
read the full Grafana Loki overview →
About booklogr
BookLogr A simple, self hosted service to keep track of your personal library. 🗒️Explore the docs » 💻View Demo 🐞Report Bug ✨Request Feature 👷Service status ❤️Sponsor this project 👉About the project BookLogr is a web app designed to help you manage your personal book library with ease. This self hosted service ensures that you have complete control over your data, providing a secure and private way to keep track of all the books you own, read, or wish to read. Optionally you can also display your library proudly to the public, sharing it with your friends and family. [!IMPORTANT] This project is under active…
read the full booklogr overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Grafana Loki or booklogr more popular?
Grafana Loki has 29,120 GitHub stars and booklogr has 637. Grafana Loki has the larger community by that measure.
Are Grafana Loki and booklogr free?
Both are open source. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and booklogr under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Grafana Loki and booklogr?
Grafana Loki is written in Go and booklogr in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Grafana Loki or booklogr?
Choose Grafana Loki if you want the larger community (29,120 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose booklogr if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.