head to head · open source

Grafana Loki vs alloy

Grafana Loki has 28,908 GitHub stars, 4,112 forks, 1,620 open issues and last shipped today. alloy has 3,547 stars, 709 forks, 1,237 open issues and last shipped today. Grafana Loki leads on adoption by 715% (28,908 vs 3,547 stars). Grafana Loki is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; alloy is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Grafana Loki has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, alloy 20%. Grafana Loki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (grafana, loki, prometheus), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana Loki ★ 29K alloy ★ 3.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana Loki alloy
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 3.5K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 709
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana Loki if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana Loki profile →

pick alloy if

  • You want the alloy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and alloy fits your workflow better

full alloy profile →

About Grafana Loki

Grafana Loki is a log aggregation system designed as the log oriented counterpart to Prometheus. It operates within the cloud native observability ecosystem, specifically targeting Kubernetes and containerized environments. Loki avoids expensive full text indexing by indexing only metadata labels attached to log streams, storing the raw log content in compressed form. This design choice makes Loki significantly simpler to operate and more cost effective than traditional log systems that index every word.

read the full Grafana Loki overview →

About alloy

Grafana Alloy is an open source OpenTelemetry Collector distribution with programmable pipelines that collects metrics, logs, traces, and profiles, and it is built for teams that run observability infrastructure and want a single agent in place of several separate collectors and exporters.

read the full alloy overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana Loki vs Uptime Kuma Grafana Loki vs worldmonitor Grafana Loki vs NetData Grafana Loki vs Grafana Grafana Loki vs huginn Grafana Loki vs Sentry Grafana Loki vs SigNoz Grafana Loki vs beszel Grafana Loki vs cilium Grafana Loki vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana Loki vs jaeger Grafana Loki vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or alloy more popular?

Grafana Loki has 28,908 GitHub stars and alloy has 3,547. Grafana Loki has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana Loki and alloy free?

Both are open source. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and alloy under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana Loki and alloy?

Grafana Loki is written in Go and alloy in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana Loki or alloy?

Choose Grafana Loki if you want the larger community (28,908 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose alloy if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.