head to head · open source

Gogs vs tuicr

Gogs has 47,821 GitHub stars, 5,069 forks, 1,009 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. tuicr has 3,148 stars, 263 forks, 133 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Gogs leads on adoption by 1,419% (47,821 vs 3,148 stars). Gogs is written in Go under MIT; tuicr is written in Rust under MIT. Gogs has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, tuicr 8%. tuicr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Gogs ★ 48K tuicr ★ 3.1K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Gogs tuicr
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 3.1K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-12 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 263
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Gogs if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Gogs profile →

pick tuicr if

  • You want the tuicr feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and tuicr fits your workflow better

full tuicr profile →

About Gogs

Gogs is a self hosted Git service written in Go and released under the MIT licence, aimed at individuals and small teams who want their own repository hosting without adopting a full collaboration platform.

read the full Gogs overview →

About tuicr

tuicr is a code review terminal user interface written in Rust and released under the MIT license. It belongs to the developer tools and version control collaboration ecosystem, and it works with git, jj, and mercurial. The project presents changes as a GitHub style continuous diff in the terminal, so a reviewer can scroll through every changed file in one stream while using vim keybindings.

read the full tuicr overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs gogs vs code-review-graph gogs vs open-code-review gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs reflex gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

Gogs vs Gitea Gogs vs open-code-review Gogs vs code-review-graph Gogs vs Reflex Gogs vs GitLab Gogs vs GitButler Gogs vs Coder Gogs vs gitpod Gogs vs pr-agent Gogs vs Encore Gogs vs reviewdog Gogs vs hunk

Frequently asked questions

Is Gogs or tuicr more popular?

Gogs has 47,821 GitHub stars and tuicr has 3,148. Gogs has the larger community by that measure.

Are Gogs and tuicr free?

Both are open source. Gogs is licensed under MIT and tuicr under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Gogs and tuicr?

Gogs is written in Go and tuicr in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Gogs or tuicr?

Choose Gogs if you want the larger community (47,821 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose tuicr if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.