head to head · open source

Gogs vs reviewboard

Gogs has 47,821 GitHub stars, 5,069 forks, 1,009 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. reviewboard has 1,724 stars, 438 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gogs leads on adoption by 2,674% (47,821 vs 1,724 stars). Gogs is written in Go under MIT; reviewboard is written in Python under MIT. Gogs has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, reviewboard 25%. reviewboard was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Gogs ★ 48K reviewboard ★ 1.7K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Gogs reviewboard
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 1.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-12 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 438
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Gogs if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Gogs profile →

pick reviewboard if

  • You want the reviewboard feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and reviewboard fits your workflow better

full reviewboard profile →

About Gogs

Gogs is a self hosted Git service written in Go and released under the MIT licence, aimed at individuals and small teams who want their own repository hosting without adopting a full collaboration platform.

read the full Gogs overview →

About reviewboard

Review Board open source web based code document review tool. Python language. MIT license. Developer tools category. Version control collaboration category. Homepage reviewboard.org. GitHub metadata: 1727 stars. 438 forks. 0 open issues. Repo age 17 years. Last push 2026 09 10T19:23:42Z. Helps companies open source projects organizations keep quality high bug count low. Began 2006 fill hole code review market. Wanted open source flexible enough variety workflows. Wanted take pain out code review process. Today used by thousands projects companies. Small startups two people. Enterprises thousands.…

read the full reviewboard overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs gogs vs code-review-graph gogs vs open-code-review gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs reflex gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

Gogs vs Gitea Gogs vs open-code-review Gogs vs code-review-graph Gogs vs Reflex Gogs vs GitLab Gogs vs GitButler Gogs vs Coder Gogs vs gitpod Gogs vs pr-agent Gogs vs Encore Gogs vs reviewdog Gogs vs hunk

Frequently asked questions

Is Gogs or reviewboard more popular?

Gogs has 47,821 GitHub stars and reviewboard has 1,724. Gogs has the larger community by that measure.

Are Gogs and reviewboard free?

Both are open source. Gogs is licensed under MIT and reviewboard under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Gogs and reviewboard?

Gogs is written in Go and reviewboard in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Gogs or reviewboard?

Choose Gogs if you want the larger community (47,821 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose reviewboard if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.