head to head · open source
Gogs vs flow-next
Gogs has 47,914 GitHub stars, 5,076 forks, 1,009 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. flow-next has 716 stars, 62 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gogs leads on adoption by 6,592% (47,914 vs 716 stars). Gogs is written in Go under MIT; flow-next is written in Python under MIT. Gogs has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, flow-next 9%. flow-next was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Gogs | flow-next | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 48K | ★ 716 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 62 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Gogs if
- You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick flow-next if
- You want the flow-next feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and flow-next fits your workflow better
About Gogs
👉 Deploy on DigitalOcean and get $200 in free credits ! 🔮 Vision The Gogs ( /gɑgz/ ) project aims to build a simple, stable and extensible self hosted Git service that can be set up in the most painless way. With Go, this can be done with an independent binary distribution across all platforms that Go supports, including Linux, macOS, Windows and ARM based systems. 📡 Overview Please visit our home page for user documentation. Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for list of changes in each releases. Want to try it before doing anything else? Do it online! Having trouble? Help yourself with troubleshooting or ask…
About flow-next
Flow Next Agents generate. flow next proves. Implementation got cheap. Reviewing it, verifying it, and keeping a codebase coherent did not. Flow Next is a workflow plugin that runs inside your coding agent. Give it the change you want and the rules your project follows. It turns that intent into specs, implementation, review, and pull requests with evidence. Your specs, decisions, and task state live in your repository. A real recorded run: plan, then cross model plan review (catches a missing guard, fix, SHIP), then implement plus tests, then impl review SHIP, ending on the receipt. Nothing staged; every frame…
read the full flow-next overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gogs or flow-next more popular?
Gogs has 47,914 GitHub stars and flow-next has 716. Gogs has the larger community by that measure.
Are Gogs and flow-next free?
Both are open source. Gogs is licensed under MIT and flow-next under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Gogs and flow-next?
Gogs is written in Go and flow-next in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Gogs or flow-next?
Choose Gogs if you want the larger community (47,914 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose flow-next if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.