head to head · open source

Gogs vs flow-next

Gogs has 47,819 GitHub stars, 5,069 forks, 1,009 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. flow-next has 699 stars, 55 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Gogs leads on adoption by 6,741% (47,819 vs 699 stars). Gogs is written in Go under MIT; flow-next is written in Python under MIT. Gogs has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, flow-next 8%. flow-next was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Gogs ★ 48K flow-next ★ 699 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Gogs flow-next
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 699
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-12 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 55
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Gogs if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Gogs profile →

pick flow-next if

  • You want the flow-next feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and flow-next fits your workflow better

full flow-next profile →

About Gogs

Gogs is a self hosted Git service written in Go and released under the MIT licence, aimed at individuals and small teams who want their own repository hosting without adopting a full collaboration platform.

read the full Gogs overview →

About flow-next

Flow Next Agents generate. flow next proves. Implementation got cheap. Reviewing it, verifying it, and keeping a codebase coherent did not. Flow Next is a workflow plugin that runs inside your coding agent. Give it the change you want and the rules your project follows. It turns that intent into specs, implementation, review, and pull requests with evidence. Your specs, decisions, and task state live in your repository. A real recorded run: plan, then cross model plan review (catches a missing guard, fix, SHIP), then implement plus tests, then impl review SHIP, ending on the receipt. Nothing staged; every frame i…

read the full flow-next overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs gogs vs code-review-graph gogs vs open-code-review gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs reflex gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

Gogs vs Gitea Gogs vs open-code-review Gogs vs code-review-graph Gogs vs Reflex Gogs vs GitLab Gogs vs GitButler Gogs vs Coder Gogs vs gitpod Gogs vs pr-agent Gogs vs Encore Gogs vs reviewdog Gogs vs hunk

Frequently asked questions

Is Gogs or flow-next more popular?

Gogs has 47,819 GitHub stars and flow-next has 699. Gogs has the larger community by that measure.

Are Gogs and flow-next free?

Both are open source. Gogs is licensed under MIT and flow-next under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Gogs and flow-next?

Gogs is written in Go and flow-next in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Gogs or flow-next?

Choose Gogs if you want the larger community (47,819 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose flow-next if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.