head to head · open source

Gogs vs cargo-crev

Gogs has 47,821 GitHub stars, 5,069 forks, 1,009 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. cargo-crev has 2,335 stars, 96 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Gogs leads on adoption by 1,948% (47,821 vs 2,335 stars). Gogs is written in Go under MIT; cargo-crev is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Gogs has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, cargo-crev 4%. Gogs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Gogs ★ 48K cargo-crev ★ 2.3K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Gogs cargo-crev
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 2.3K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-12 2026-07-21
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 96
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Gogs if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Gogs profile →

pick cargo-crev if

  • You want the cargo-crev feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and cargo-crev fits your workflow better

full cargo-crev profile →

About Gogs

Gogs is a self hosted Git service written in Go and released under the MIT licence, aimed at individuals and small teams who want their own repository hosting without adopting a full collaboration platform.

read the full Gogs overview →

About cargo-crev

cargo crev is a command line tool for the Rust package manager ecosystem. It implements Crev, a distributed code review system that is language and ecosystem agnostic, as a cargo subcommand. The project is written in Rust and licensed under Apache 2.0. It is listed under Developer Tools / Version Control & Collaboration.

read the full cargo-crev overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs gogs vs code-review-graph gogs vs open-code-review gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs reflex gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

Gogs vs Gitea Gogs vs open-code-review Gogs vs code-review-graph Gogs vs Reflex Gogs vs GitLab Gogs vs GitButler Gogs vs Coder Gogs vs gitpod Gogs vs pr-agent Gogs vs Encore Gogs vs reviewdog Gogs vs hunk

Frequently asked questions

Is Gogs or cargo-crev more popular?

Gogs has 47,821 GitHub stars and cargo-crev has 2,335. Gogs has the larger community by that measure.

Are Gogs and cargo-crev free?

Both are open source. Gogs is licensed under MIT and cargo-crev under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Gogs and cargo-crev?

Gogs is written in Go and cargo-crev in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Gogs or cargo-crev?

Choose Gogs if you want the larger community (47,821 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cargo-crev if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.