head to head · open source

gofr vs Pulse

gofr has 20,817 GitHub stars, 1,790 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Pulse has 7,253 stars, 380 forks, 46 open issues and last shipped 25 days ago. gofr leads on adoption by 187% (20,817 vs 7,253 stars). gofr is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Pulse is written in Swift under MIT. gofr has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Pulse 5%. gofr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gofr ★ 21K Pulse ★ 7.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

gofr Pulse
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 7.3K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Swift
Last push 2026-11-03 2026-10-11
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 380
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gofr if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gofr profile →

pick Pulse if

  • You want the Pulse feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and Pulse fits your workflow better

full Pulse profile →

About gofr

Go Fr GoFr: An Opinionated Microservice Development Framework Listed in the CNCF Landscape 🎯 Goal GoFr is designed to simplify microservice development , with a key focus on Kubernetes deployment and out of the box observability . While capable of building generic applications, microservices remain at its core. 💡 Key Features 1. Simple API Syntax 2. REST Standards by Default 3. Configuration Management 4. Observability (Logs, Traces, Metrics) 5. Inbuilt Auth Middleware & Custom Middleware Support 6. gRPC Support 7. HTTP Service with Circuit Breaker Support 8. Pub/Sub 9. Health Check for All Datasources 10…

read the full gofr overview →

About Pulse

Pulse is a powerful logging system for Apple Platforms. Native. Built with SwiftUI. Record and inspect logs and URLSession network requests right from your iOS app. Share logs and view them in Pulse Pro or use remote logging to see them in real time. Logs are stored locally and never leave your devices. About Pulse is not just a tool, it's a framework. It records events from URLSession or from frameworks that use it, such as Alamofire or Get, and displays them using PulseUI views that you integrate directly into your app. This way Pulse console is available for everyone who has your test builds. You or your QA…

read the full Pulse overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is gofr or Pulse more popular?

gofr has 20,817 GitHub stars and Pulse has 7,253. gofr has the larger community by that measure.

Are gofr and Pulse free?

Both are open source. gofr is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pulse under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gofr and Pulse?

gofr is written in Go and Pulse in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gofr or Pulse?

Choose gofr if you want the larger community (20,817 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Pulse if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.