head to head · open source
gofr vs logtape
gofr has 20,817 GitHub stars, 1,790 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. logtape has 2,026 stars, 55 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. gofr leads on adoption by 927% (20,817 vs 2,026 stars). gofr is written in Go under Apache-2.0; logtape is written in TypeScript under MIT. gofr has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, logtape 3%. gofr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| gofr | logtape | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 55 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick gofr if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick logtape if
- You want the logtape feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and logtape fits your workflow better
About gofr
Go Fr GoFr: An Opinionated Microservice Development Framework Listed in the CNCF Landscape 🎯 Goal GoFr is designed to simplify microservice development , with a key focus on Kubernetes deployment and out of the box observability . While capable of building generic applications, microservices remain at its core. 💡 Key Features 1. Simple API Syntax 2. REST Standards by Default 3. Configuration Management 4. Observability (Logs, Traces, Metrics) 5. Inbuilt Auth Middleware & Custom Middleware Support 6. gRPC Support 7. HTTP Service with Circuit Breaker Support 8. Pub/Sub 9. Health Check for All Datasources 10…
About logtape
LogTape ======= [![JSR][JSR badge]][JSR] [![npm][npm badge]][npm] [![Bundlephobia][Bundlephobia badge]][Bundlephobia] [![GitHub Actions][GitHub Actions badge]][GitHub Actions] [![Codecov][Codecov badge]][Codecov] LogTape is a logging library for JavaScript and TypeScript designed with a library first philosophy. Unlike traditional loggers, LogTape is unobtrusive—libraries can safely log without any configuration, while applications retain full control. With zero dependencies and universal runtime support, it works seamlessly across Deno, Node.js, Bun, browsers, and edge functions. The highlights of LogTape are…
read the full logtape overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is gofr or logtape more popular?
gofr has 20,817 GitHub stars and logtape has 2,026. gofr has the larger community by that measure.
Are gofr and logtape free?
Both are open source. gofr is licensed under Apache-2.0 and logtape under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between gofr and logtape?
gofr is written in Go and logtape in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, gofr or logtape?
Choose gofr if you want the larger community (20,817 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose logtape if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.