head to head · open source

gofr vs log

gofr has 20,909 GitHub stars, 1,760 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. log has 3,394 stars, 102 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. gofr leads on adoption by 516% (20,909 vs 3,394 stars). gofr is written in Go under Apache-2.0; log is written in Go under MIT. gofr has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, log 3%. gofr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (golang, logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gofr ★ 21K log ★ 3.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

gofr log
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 3.4K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-03
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 102
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gofr if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gofr profile →

pick log if

  • You want the log feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and log fits your workflow better

full log profile →

About gofr

GoFr is an opinionated Go framework for building microservices, aimed at Go developers and platform teams who want HTTP, gRPC, data access and observability built in rather than assembled from separate libraries.

read the full gofr overview →

About log

Charm's log is a minimal, colorful, MIT licensed logging library for Go, aimed at Go developers who want leveled, structured, human readable output and a small API instead of hand assembling formatting and level filtering on top of the standard library.

read the full log overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

gofr vs Uptime Kuma gofr vs worldmonitor gofr vs NetData gofr vs Grafana gofr vs huginn gofr vs Sentry gofr vs SigNoz gofr vs Grafana Loki gofr vs beszel gofr vs cilium gofr vs Apache SkyWalking gofr vs jaeger

Frequently asked questions

Is gofr or log more popular?

gofr has 20,909 GitHub stars and log has 3,394. gofr has the larger community by that measure.

Are gofr and log free?

Both are open source. gofr is licensed under Apache-2.0 and log under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gofr and log?

gofr is written in Go and log in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gofr or log?

Choose gofr if you want the larger community (20,909 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose log if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.