head to head · open source

gofr vs kotlin-logging

gofr has 20,909 GitHub stars, 1,760 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. kotlin-logging has 3,111 stars, 130 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. gofr leads on adoption by 572% (20,909 vs 3,111 stars). gofr is written in Go under Apache-2.0; kotlin-logging is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. gofr has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, kotlin-logging 4%. gofr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gofr ★ 21K kotlin-logging ★ 3.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

gofr kotlin-logging
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 3.1K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-05-27
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 130
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gofr if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gofr profile →

pick kotlin-logging if

  • You want the kotlin-logging feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and kotlin-logging fits your workflow better

full kotlin-logging profile →

About gofr

GoFr is an opinionated Go framework for building microservices, aimed at Go developers and platform teams who want HTTP, gRPC, data access and observability built in rather than assembled from separate libraries.

read the full gofr overview →

About kotlin-logging

kotlin logging is a lightweight, pure Kotlin logging facade that gives JVM, Android, and multiplatform Kotlin applications lazy, idiomatic log calls while delegating the actual logging work to SLF4J and whichever backend implementation the project already uses.

read the full kotlin-logging overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

gofr vs Uptime Kuma gofr vs worldmonitor gofr vs NetData gofr vs Grafana gofr vs huginn gofr vs Sentry gofr vs SigNoz gofr vs Grafana Loki gofr vs beszel gofr vs cilium gofr vs Apache SkyWalking gofr vs jaeger

Frequently asked questions

Is gofr or kotlin-logging more popular?

gofr has 20,909 GitHub stars and kotlin-logging has 3,111. gofr has the larger community by that measure.

Are gofr and kotlin-logging free?

Both are open source. gofr is licensed under Apache-2.0 and kotlin-logging under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gofr and kotlin-logging?

gofr is written in Go and kotlin-logging in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gofr or kotlin-logging?

Choose gofr if you want the larger community (20,909 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose kotlin-logging if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.