head to head · open source
gofr vs FASTER
gofr has 20,817 GitHub stars, 1,790 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. FASTER has 6,635 stars, 592 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. gofr leads on adoption by 214% (20,817 vs 6,635 stars). gofr is written in Go under Apache-2.0; FASTER is written in C# under MIT. gofr has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, FASTER 9%. gofr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| gofr | FASTER | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 6.6K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 592 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick gofr if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick FASTER if
- You want the FASTER feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and FASTER fits your workflow better
About gofr
Go Fr GoFr: An Opinionated Microservice Development Framework Listed in the CNCF Landscape 🎯 Goal GoFr is designed to simplify microservice development , with a key focus on Kubernetes deployment and out of the box observability . While capable of building generic applications, microservices remain at its core. 💡 Key Features 1. Simple API Syntax 2. REST Standards by Default 3. Configuration Management 4. Observability (Logs, Traces, Metrics) 5. Inbuilt Auth Middleware & Custom Middleware Support 6. gRPC Support 7. HTTP Service with Circuit Breaker Support 8. Pub/Sub 9. Health Check for All Datasources 10…
About FASTER
[!IMPORTANT] This repository is no longer actively maintained. We encourage users to look at Garnet — this project evolves FASTER into a full fledged remote cache store with strong performance (throughput and latency), scalability, storage, recovery, and more. Garnet's storage engine, Tsavorite , is a highly optimized and evolved fork of FASTER. Introduction Managing large application state easily, resiliently, and with high performance is one of the hardest problems in the cloud today. The FASTER project offers two artifacts to help tackle this problem. FASTER Log is a high performance concurrent persistent…
read the full FASTER overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is gofr or FASTER more popular?
gofr has 20,817 GitHub stars and FASTER has 6,635. gofr has the larger community by that measure.
Are gofr and FASTER free?
Both are open source. gofr is licensed under Apache-2.0 and FASTER under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between gofr and FASTER?
gofr is written in Go and FASTER in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, gofr or FASTER?
Choose gofr if you want the larger community (20,817 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose FASTER if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.