head to head · open source
gofr vs FASTER
gofr has 20,909 GitHub stars, 1,760 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. FASTER has 6,636 stars, 595 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. gofr leads on adoption by 215% (20,909 vs 6,636 stars). gofr is written in Go under Apache-2.0; FASTER is written in C# under MIT. gofr has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, FASTER 9%. gofr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| gofr | FASTER | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 6.6K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | C# |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-08-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 595 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick gofr if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick FASTER if
- You want the FASTER feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and FASTER fits your workflow better
About gofr
GoFr is an opinionated Go framework for building microservices, aimed at Go developers and platform teams who want HTTP, gRPC, data access and observability built in rather than assembled from separate libraries.
About FASTER
FASTER is an open source project from Microsoft that provides a fast persistent recoverable log and key value store plus cache, implemented in C and C++. It lives in the .NET ecosystem, with a parallel C++ implementation of the key value component, and is distributed primarily through the NuGet package Microsoft.FASTER.Core. The repository carries the MIT license and the project has been in development for roughly eight years, with topics covering concurrent and multi threaded operation, hash tables, indexing, key value storage, logging, persistence, and recoverability.
read the full FASTER overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is gofr or FASTER more popular?
gofr has 20,909 GitHub stars and FASTER has 6,636. gofr has the larger community by that measure.
Are gofr and FASTER free?
Both are open source. gofr is licensed under Apache-2.0 and FASTER under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between gofr and FASTER?
gofr is written in Go and FASTER in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, gofr or FASTER?
Choose gofr if you want the larger community (20,909 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose FASTER if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.