head to head · open source
gofr vs clp
gofr has 20,817 GitHub stars, 1,790 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. clp has 1,091 stars, 95 forks, 493 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gofr leads on adoption by 1,808% (20,817 vs 1,091 stars). gofr is written in Go under Apache-2.0; clp is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. gofr has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, clp 9%. clp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| gofr | clp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | C++ |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 95 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick gofr if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick clp if
- You want the clp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You evaluated both and clp fits your workflow better
About gofr
Go Fr GoFr: An Opinionated Microservice Development Framework Listed in the CNCF Landscape 🎯 Goal GoFr is designed to simplify microservice development , with a key focus on Kubernetes deployment and out of the box observability . While capable of building generic applications, microservices remain at its core. 💡 Key Features 1. Simple API Syntax 2. REST Standards by Default 3. Configuration Management 4. Observability (Logs, Traces, Metrics) 5. Inbuilt Auth Middleware & Custom Middleware Support 6. gRPC Support 7. HTTP Service with Circuit Breaker Support 8. Pub/Sub 9. Health Check for All Datasources 10…
About clp
[![Discord][badge discord]][clp community discord] [![Slack][badge slack]][clp community slack] [![CLP on Zulip][badge zulip]][yscope community zulip] YScope's Compressed Log Processor (CLP) compresses your logs, and allows you to search the compressed logs without decompression. CLP supports both JSON logs and unstructured (i.e., free text) logs. It also supports real time log compression within several logging libraries. CLP also includes purpose built web interfaces for searching and viewing the compressed logs. To learn more about it, read our [2021 paper][clp paper 21] about handling unstructured logs and…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is gofr or clp more popular?
gofr has 20,817 GitHub stars and clp has 1,091. gofr has the larger community by that measure.
Are gofr and clp free?
Both are open source. gofr is licensed under Apache-2.0 and clp under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between gofr and clp?
gofr is written in Go and clp in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, gofr or clp?
Choose gofr if you want the larger community (20,817 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose clp if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.