head to head · open source

go2rtc vs tubearchivist

go2rtc has 14,208 GitHub stars, 1,323 forks, 928 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. tubearchivist has 8,451 stars, 420 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. go2rtc leads on adoption by 68% (14,208 vs 8,451 stars). go2rtc is written in Go under MIT; tubearchivist is written in Python under GPL-3.0. go2rtc has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, tubearchivist 5%. go2rtc was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

go2rtc ★ 14K tubearchivist ★ 8.5K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

go2rtc tubearchivist
GitHub stars ★ 14K ★ 8.5K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-06 2026-08-28
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 420
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick go2rtc if

  • You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full go2rtc profile →

pick tubearchivist if

  • You want the tubearchivist feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and tubearchivist fits your workflow better

full tubearchivist profile →

About go2rtc

go2rtc is a camera streaming application written in Go and released under the MIT license. It runs as a zero dependency binary on Windows, macOS, Linux, and FreeBSD, and it also ships as a Docker image, a Home Assistant add on, and a Home Assistant integration. The project lives in the smart home and media server ecosystem, with topics spanning Home Assistant, HomeKit, ONVIF, RTSP, RTMP, HLS, MJPEG, MP4, and FFmpeg. It can be embedded into another project through its HTTP API or run as a standalone application with a web interface at http://localhost:1984/ .

read the full go2rtc overview →

About tubearchivist

Tube Archivist is a self hosted YouTube media server that downloads videos with yt dlp, indexes them with metadata from YouTube, and serves them back through a searchable web interface, built for people whose personal YouTube archive has grown past the point where folders and filenames still work.

read the full tubearchivist overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

mediamtx vs go2rtc mediamtx vs tubearchivist go2rtc vs streama mediamtx vs streama mediamtx vs cloudflare-imgbed mediamtx vs node-media-server mediamtx vs lychee mediamtx vs seanime next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.

go2rtc vs mediamtx go2rtc vs streama go2rtc vs CloudFlare-ImgBed go2rtc vs Node-Media-Server go2rtc vs Lychee go2rtc vs seanime go2rtc vs Piwigo go2rtc vs nginx-http-flv-module go2rtc vs foss_photo_libraries go2rtc vs tubesync go2rtc vs UniversalMediaServer go2rtc vs lap

Frequently asked questions

Is go2rtc or tubearchivist more popular?

go2rtc has 14,208 GitHub stars and tubearchivist has 8,451. go2rtc has the larger community by that measure.

Are go2rtc and tubearchivist free?

Both are open source. go2rtc is licensed under MIT and tubearchivist under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between go2rtc and tubearchivist?

go2rtc is written in Go and tubearchivist in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, go2rtc or tubearchivist?

Choose go2rtc if you want the larger community (14,208 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose tubearchivist if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.