head to head · open source
go2rtc vs tubearchivist
go2rtc has 14,556 GitHub stars, 1,461 forks, 928 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. tubearchivist has 8,561 stars, 433 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. go2rtc leads on adoption by 70% (14,556 vs 8,561 stars). go2rtc is written in Go under MIT; tubearchivist is written in Python under GPL-3.0. go2rtc has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, tubearchivist 5%. go2rtc was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| go2rtc | tubearchivist | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 15K | ★ 8.6K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-26 | 2026-10-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.5K | ⑂ 433 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick go2rtc if
- You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick tubearchivist if
- You want the tubearchivist feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and tubearchivist fits your workflow better
About go2rtc
Ultimate camera streaming application with support for dozens formats and protocols. zero dependency small app for all OS (Windows, macOS, Linux, FreeBSD) zero delay for many supported protocols (lowest possible streaming latency) streaming input from dozens formats and protocols streaming output in all popular formats streaming ingest in a number of popular formats publish any source to popular streaming services (YouTube, Telegram) on the fly transcoding only if necessary via FFmpeg two way audio support for many formats streaming audio to all cameras with two way audio support mixing tracks from different…
read the full go2rtc overview →
About tubearchivist
more screenshots and video Table of contents Docs with FAQ, and API documentation Core functionality Resources Installing Getting Started Known limitations Port Collisions Common Errors Roadmap Donate Core functionality Once your YouTube video collection grows, it becomes hard to search and find a specific video. That's where Tube Archivist comes in: By indexing your video collection with metadata from YouTube, you can organize, search and enjoy your archived YouTube videos without hassle offline through a convenient web interface. This includes: Subscribe to your favorite YouTube channels Download Videos using…
read the full tubearchivist overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is go2rtc or tubearchivist more popular?
go2rtc has 14,556 GitHub stars and tubearchivist has 8,561. go2rtc has the larger community by that measure.
Are go2rtc and tubearchivist free?
Both are open source. go2rtc is licensed under MIT and tubearchivist under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between go2rtc and tubearchivist?
go2rtc is written in Go and tubearchivist in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, go2rtc or tubearchivist?
Choose go2rtc if you want the larger community (14,556 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose tubearchivist if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.