head to head · open source
go2rtc vs foss_photo_libraries
go2rtc has 14,556 GitHub stars, 1,461 forks, 928 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. foss_photo_libraries has 2,818 stars, 73 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. go2rtc leads on adoption by 417% (14,556 vs 2,818 stars). go2rtc is written in Go under MIT; foss_photo_libraries is written in Python under MIT. go2rtc has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, foss_photo_libraries 3%. go2rtc was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| go2rtc | foss_photo_libraries | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 15K | ★ 2.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-26 | 2026-04-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.5K | ⑂ 73 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick go2rtc if
- You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick foss_photo_libraries if
- You want the foss_photo_libraries feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and foss_photo_libraries fits your workflow better
About go2rtc
Ultimate camera streaming application with support for dozens formats and protocols. zero dependency small app for all OS (Windows, macOS, Linux, FreeBSD) zero delay for many supported protocols (lowest possible streaming latency) streaming input from dozens formats and protocols streaming output in all popular formats streaming ingest in a number of popular formats publish any source to popular streaming services (YouTube, Telegram) on the fly transcoding only if necessary via FFmpeg two way audio support for many formats streaming audio to all cameras with two way audio support mixing tracks from different…
read the full go2rtc overview →
About foss_photo_libraries
📸 Free and OpenSource Photo Libraries There are many great free and open source alternatives to closed source and/or paid photo libraries. This project aims to track and compare the feature set between the many different options with a focus on 'Gratis' (free as in free beer) open source photo libraries. 'Libre' (free as in free speech) projects are also welcome, but will likely need to be submitted via a pull request since the time in testing each different project is significant. ⚠️ Disclaimer: This repository displays both objective and subjective measures of feature quality. The owner of this repository…
read the full foss_photo_libraries overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is go2rtc or foss_photo_libraries more popular?
go2rtc has 14,556 GitHub stars and foss_photo_libraries has 2,818. go2rtc has the larger community by that measure.
Are go2rtc and foss_photo_libraries free?
Both are open source. go2rtc is licensed under MIT and foss_photo_libraries under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between go2rtc and foss_photo_libraries?
go2rtc is written in Go and foss_photo_libraries in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, go2rtc or foss_photo_libraries?
Choose go2rtc if you want the larger community (14,556 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose foss_photo_libraries if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.