head to head · open source
gitpod vs reviewdog
gitpod has 13,803 GitHub stars, 1,392 forks, 452 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. reviewdog has 9,719 stars, 512 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. gitpod leads on adoption by 42% (13,803 vs 9,719 stars). gitpod is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; reviewdog is written in Go under MIT. gitpod has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, reviewdog 5%. reviewdog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (code-review), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| gitpod | reviewdog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 14K | ★ 9.7K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 512 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick gitpod if
- You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick reviewdog if
- You want the reviewdog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and reviewdog fits your workflow better
About gitpod
Gitpod has been renamed to Ona mission control for software projects and software engineering agents . We no longer recommend this version of Gitpod, users should take advantage of Ona's free tier or contact sales for enterprise. With Ona you gain more powerful development environments than Gitpod Classic with industry standard specifications based on Dev Container and Ona Agents. Gitpod Classic Gitpod Classic is a developer platform providing on demand, pre configured development environments in the cloud. It allows developers to spin up secure workspaces with a simple .gitpod.yml configuration file…
read the full gitpod overview →
About reviewdog
reviewdog A code review dog who keeps your codebase healthy. reviewdog provides a way to post review comments to code hosting services, such as GitHub, automatically by integrating with any linter tools with ease. It uses an output of lint tools and posts them as a comment if findings are in the diff of patches to review. reviewdog also supports running in the local environment to filter the output of lint tools by diff. design doc Table of Contents Installation Input Format 'errorformat' Available pre defined 'errorformat' Reviewdog Diagnostic Format (RDFormat) Diff checkstyle format SARIF format Code…
read the full reviewdog overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is gitpod or reviewdog more popular?
gitpod has 13,803 GitHub stars and reviewdog has 9,719. gitpod has the larger community by that measure.
Are gitpod and reviewdog free?
Both are open source. gitpod is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and reviewdog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between gitpod and reviewdog?
gitpod is written in TypeScript and reviewdog in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, gitpod or reviewdog?
Choose gitpod if you want the larger community (13,803 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose reviewdog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.