head to head · open source

gitleaks vs swarmclaw

gitleaks has 29,368 GitHub stars, 2,237 forks, 481 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. swarmclaw has 673 stars, 137 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. gitleaks leads on adoption by 4,264% (29,368 vs 673 stars). gitleaks is written in Go under MIT; swarmclaw is written in TypeScript under MIT. gitleaks has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, swarmclaw 20%. gitleaks was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gitleaks ★ 29K swarmclaw ★ 673 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

gitleaks swarmclaw
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 673
License MIT MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-06-30
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 137
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gitleaks if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gitleaks profile →

pick swarmclaw if

  • You want the swarmclaw feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and swarmclaw fits your workflow better

full swarmclaw profile →

About gitleaks

Gitleaks is an MIT licensed, Go based command line tool that detects hardcoded secrets such as passwords, API keys, and tokens in git repositories, files, and standard input, and it serves developers and security teams that need to keep credentials out of source control.

read the full gitleaks overview →

About swarmclaw

SwarmClaw is an open source, self hosted AI agent runtime and multi agent framework for autonomous agent swarms, written in TypeScript under the MIT licence for developers and operators who want to run AI agents and agent orchestration on their own infrastructure.

read the full swarmclaw overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

gitleaks vs ansible gitleaks vs compose gitleaks vs conductor gitleaks vs xxl-job gitleaks vs Kestra gitleaks vs haystack gitleaks vs rancher gitleaks vs Prefect gitleaks vs Archon gitleaks vs Temporal gitleaks vs rowboat gitleaks vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is gitleaks or swarmclaw more popular?

gitleaks has 29,368 GitHub stars and swarmclaw has 673. gitleaks has the larger community by that measure.

Are gitleaks and swarmclaw free?

Both are open source. gitleaks is licensed under MIT and swarmclaw under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gitleaks and swarmclaw?

gitleaks is written in Go and swarmclaw in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gitleaks or swarmclaw?

Choose gitleaks if you want the larger community (29,368 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose swarmclaw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.