head to head · open source

gitleaks vs Dyrector

gitleaks has 29,364 GitHub stars, 2,236 forks, 481 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. Dyrector has 1,847 stars, 129 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. gitleaks leads on adoption by 1,490% (29,364 vs 1,847 stars). gitleaks is written in Go under MIT; Dyrector is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. gitleaks has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Dyrector 7%. Dyrector was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (golang, hacktoberfest), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gitleaks ★ 29K Dyrector ★ 1.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

gitleaks Dyrector
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 1.8K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 129
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gitleaks if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gitleaks profile →

pick Dyrector if

  • You want the Dyrector feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Dyrector fits your workflow better

full Dyrector profile →

About gitleaks

Gitleaks is an MIT licensed, Go based command line tool that detects hardcoded secrets such as passwords, API keys, and tokens in git repositories, files, and standard input, and it serves developers and security teams that need to keep credentials out of source control.

read the full gitleaks overview →

About Dyrector

Dyrector is a self hosted continuous delivery and deployment platform with version management for OCI containers. It lives in the container orchestration and software delivery ecosystem, and it supports Docker, Kubernetes, and Podman environments while using agents that communicate with the platform over gRPC with TLS encryption.

read the full Dyrector overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs gitleaks compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher conductor vs xxl-job compose vs prefect uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

gitleaks vs compose gitleaks vs conductor gitleaks vs xxl-job gitleaks vs Kestra gitleaks vs haystack gitleaks vs rancher gitleaks vs Prefect gitleaks vs Archon gitleaks vs Temporal gitleaks vs rowboat gitleaks vs Trigger gitleaks vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is gitleaks or Dyrector more popular?

gitleaks has 29,364 GitHub stars and Dyrector has 1,847. gitleaks has the larger community by that measure.

Are gitleaks and Dyrector free?

Both are open source. gitleaks is licensed under MIT and Dyrector under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gitleaks and Dyrector?

gitleaks is written in Go and Dyrector in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gitleaks or Dyrector?

Choose gitleaks if you want the larger community (29,364 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Dyrector if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.