head to head · open source

gentle-shell vs openqodex

gentle-shell has 1,260 GitHub stars, 188 forks, 369 open issues and last shipped today. openqodex has 519 stars, 34 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped today. gentle-shell leads on adoption by 143% (1,260 vs 519 stars). gentle-shell is written in TypeScript under MIT; openqodex is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. gentle-shell has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, openqodex 7%. gentle-shell was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (agent-skills, ai-agents, code-review, coding-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gentle-shell ★ 1.3K openqodex ★ 519 category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

gentle-shell openqodex
GitHub stars ★ 1.3K ★ 519
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-10 2026-10-10
Forks ⑂ 188 ⑂ 34
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gentle-shell if

  • You weight community size — 1.3K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gentle-shell profile →

pick openqodex if

  • You want the openqodex feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and openqodex fits your workflow better

full openqodex profile →

About gentle-shell

gentle shell is a senior architect development harness for the Pi platform that turns a terminal coding agent into a controlled workspace with spec driven development, focused subagents, strict TDD evidence, review guardrails, and skill discovery.

read the full gentle-shell overview →

About openqodex

OpenQodex is an open source AI code review tool that runs before you push, for developers who work inside Claude Code or Codex and want scanner backed findings checked by a separate reviewer process.

read the full openqodex overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 276K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs codegraph vs code-review-graph gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs reflex gogs vs open-code-review gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

gentle-shell vs Gitea gentle-shell vs Gogs gentle-shell vs open-code-review gentle-shell vs code-review-graph gentle-shell vs Reflex gentle-shell vs GitLab gentle-shell vs GitButler gentle-shell vs Coder gentle-shell vs gitpod gentle-shell vs pr-agent gentle-shell vs Encore gentle-shell vs reviewdog

Frequently asked questions

Is gentle-shell or openqodex more popular?

gentle-shell has 1,260 GitHub stars and openqodex has 519. gentle-shell has the larger community by that measure.

Are gentle-shell and openqodex free?

Both are open source. gentle-shell is licensed under MIT and openqodex under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gentle-shell and openqodex?

gentle-shell is written in TypeScript and openqodex in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gentle-shell or openqodex?

Choose gentle-shell if you want the larger community (1,260 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose openqodex if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.