head to head · open source

flowable-engine vs openworkflow

flowable-engine has 9,635 GitHub stars, 2,904 forks, 411 open issues and last shipped 18 days ago. openworkflow has 1,347 stars, 73 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. flowable-engine leads on adoption by 615% (9,635 vs 1,347 stars). flowable-engine is written in Java under Apache-2.0; openworkflow is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. flowable-engine has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, openworkflow 5%. openworkflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (workflow, workflow-engine), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

flowable-engine ★ 9.6K openworkflow ★ 1.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

flowable-engine openworkflow
GitHub stars ★ 9.6K ★ 1.3K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-18 2026-11-03
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 73
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick flowable-engine if

  • You weight community size — 9.6K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full flowable-engine profile →

pick openworkflow if

  • You want the openworkflow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and openworkflow fits your workflow better

full openworkflow profile →

About flowable-engine

Flowable ======== Homepage: flowable / flowəb(ə)l / a compact and highly efficient workflow and Business Process Management (BPM) platform for developers, system admins and business users. a lightning fast, tried and tested BPMN process engine, CMMN case engine and DMN rule engine written in Java. It is Apache 2.0 licensed open source, with a committed community. can run embedded in a Java application, or as a service on a server, a cluster, and in the cloud. It integrates perfectly with Spring. With a rich Java and REST API, it is the ideal engine for orchestrating human or system activities. Introduction…

read the full flowable-engine overview →

About openworkflow

OpenWorkflow OpenWorkflow is a TypeScript framework for building durable, resumable workflows that can pause for seconds or months, survive crashes and deploys, and resume exactly where they left off all without extra servers to manage. Quick Start The CLI will guide you through setup and generate everything you need to get started. Documentation Documentation Quick Start Guide Core Concepts Advanced Patterns Production Checklist OpenTelemetry Architecture Read ARCHITECTURE.md for a deep dive into how OpenWorkflow works under the hood. Examples Check out examples/ for working examples. Contributing We welcome…

read the full openworkflow overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Frequently asked questions

Is flowable-engine or openworkflow more popular?

flowable-engine has 9,635 GitHub stars and openworkflow has 1,347. flowable-engine has the larger community by that measure.

Are flowable-engine and openworkflow free?

Both are open source. flowable-engine is licensed under Apache-2.0 and openworkflow under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between flowable-engine and openworkflow?

flowable-engine is written in Java and openworkflow in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, flowable-engine or openworkflow?

Choose flowable-engine if you want the larger community (9,635 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose openworkflow if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.