head to head · open source

gitleaks vs flowable-engine

gitleaks has 29,396 GitHub stars, 2,236 forks, 481 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. flowable-engine has 9,542 stars, 2,890 forks, 411 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. gitleaks leads on adoption by 208% (29,396 vs 9,542 stars). gitleaks is written in Go under MIT; flowable-engine is written in Java under Apache-2.0. gitleaks has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, flowable-engine 30%. flowable-engine was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gitleaks ★ 29K flowable-engine ★ 9.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

gitleaks flowable-engine
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 9.5K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 2.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gitleaks if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gitleaks profile →

pick flowable-engine if

  • You want the flowable-engine feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and flowable-engine fits your workflow better

full flowable-engine profile →

About gitleaks

Gitleaks is an MIT licensed, Go based command line tool that detects hardcoded secrets such as passwords, API keys, and tokens in git repositories, files, and standard input, and it serves developers and security teams that need to keep credentials out of source control.

read the full gitleaks overview →

About flowable-engine

Flowable is an open source workflow and Business Process Management platform written in Java and distributed under the Apache 2.0 license. It bundles three engines in one project: a BPMN process engine, a CMMN case engine, and a DMN rule engine. The project lives in the Java ecosystem, integrates with Spring, and exposes both a Java API and a REST API for orchestrating human or system activities.

read the full flowable-engine overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

ansible vs gitleaks n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

gitleaks vs ansible gitleaks vs compose gitleaks vs conductor gitleaks vs xxl-job gitleaks vs Kestra gitleaks vs haystack gitleaks vs rancher gitleaks vs Prefect gitleaks vs Archon gitleaks vs Temporal gitleaks vs rowboat gitleaks vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is gitleaks or flowable-engine more popular?

gitleaks has 29,396 GitHub stars and flowable-engine has 9,542. gitleaks has the larger community by that measure.

Are gitleaks and flowable-engine free?

Both are open source. gitleaks is licensed under MIT and flowable-engine under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gitleaks and flowable-engine?

gitleaks is written in Go and flowable-engine in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gitleaks or flowable-engine?

Choose gitleaks if you want the larger community (29,396 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose flowable-engine if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.