head to head · open source
floci vs freelens
floci has 27,815 GitHub stars, 3,110 forks, 130 open issues and last shipped yesterday. freelens has 5,769 stars, 357 forks, 223 open issues and last shipped yesterday. floci leads on adoption by 382% (27,815 vs 5,769 stars). floci is written in Java under MIT; freelens is written in TypeScript under MIT. floci has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, freelens 6%. floci was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (devops), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| floci | freelens | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 28K | ★ 5.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Java | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.1K | ⑂ 357 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick floci if
- You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick freelens if
- You want the freelens feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and freelens fits your workflow better
About floci
Any Cloud. Locally. Light, fluffy, and always free No account. No auth token. No feature gates. Just docker compose up . Quick Start · Features · Services · SDKs · Testcontainers · Migration · Docs What is Floci? Floci is a free, open source local AWS emulator for development, testing, and CI. It gives you AWS shaped services on your machine without requiring a cloud account, an auth token, or paid feature gates. Point your AWS SDK, CLI, Terraform, CDK, OpenTofu, or test suite at and keep your existing workflows. Already using LocalStack? Floci is a drop in replacement: swap the image and keep going. See…
read the full floci overview →
About freelens
Freelens Freelens is a free and open source user interface designed for managing Kubernetes clusters. It provides a standalone application compatible with macOS, Windows, and Linux operating systems, making it accessible to a wide range of users. The application aims to simplify the complexities of Kubernetes management by offering an intuitive and user friendly interface. Requirements Kubernetes 1.22 or later. Older clusters fall back to the bundled kubectl , which may not work correctly; a different one can be set in Preferences. Downloads See the releases page and download the right package for your system…
read the full freelens overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is floci or freelens more popular?
floci has 27,815 GitHub stars and freelens has 5,769. floci has the larger community by that measure.
Are floci and freelens free?
Both are open source. floci is licensed under MIT and freelens under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between floci and freelens?
floci is written in Java and freelens in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, floci or freelens?
Choose floci if you want the larger community (27,815 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose freelens if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.