head to head · open source

firecrawl vs macro-tasks

firecrawl has 181,627 GitHub stars, 9,834 forks, 621 open issues and last shipped yesterday. macro-tasks has 4,345 stars, 416 forks, 100 open issues and last shipped yesterday. firecrawl leads on adoption by 4,080% (181,627 vs 4,345 stars). firecrawl is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; macro-tasks is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. firecrawl has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, macro-tasks 10%. macro-tasks was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai, ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

firecrawl ★ 182K macro-tasks ★ 4.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

firecrawl macro-tasks
GitHub stars ★ 182K ★ 4.3K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 9.8K ⑂ 416
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick firecrawl if

  • You weight community size — 182K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full firecrawl profile →

pick macro-tasks if

  • You want the macro-tasks feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and macro-tasks fits your workflow better

full macro-tasks profile →

About firecrawl

Firecrawl is an open source web context API that enables AI agents to search, scrape, and interact with websites at scale. It lives in the AI and data extraction ecosystem, providing structured, LLM ready outputs from unstructured web content. Built in TypeScript and licensed under AGPL 3.0, it supports both self hosting and a hosted service via firecrawl.dev.

read the full firecrawl overview →

About macro-tasks

Macro is an open source unified workspace named macro tasks, built in Rust and SolidJS under AGPL 3.0. It brings email, messages, docs, tasks, canvas, agents, calls, files, pull requests, and CRM into one web interface. The project lives in the Rust and SolidJS web ecosystem, with GitHub topics such as agent, ai, mcp, messaging, notes, notion, crm, email, and linear.

read the full macro-tasks overview →

More in Miscellaneous

Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K LosslessCut ★ 44K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs parlant firecrawl vs crm firecrawl vs hanko firecrawl vs hey firecrawl vs octobot firecrawl vs sigle firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs fleetbase

Frequently asked questions

Is firecrawl or macro-tasks more popular?

firecrawl has 181,627 GitHub stars and macro-tasks has 4,345. firecrawl has the larger community by that measure.

Are firecrawl and macro-tasks free?

Both are open source. firecrawl is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and macro-tasks under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between firecrawl and macro-tasks?

firecrawl is written in TypeScript and macro-tasks in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, firecrawl or macro-tasks?

Choose firecrawl if you want the larger community (181,627 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose macro-tasks if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.