head to head · open source
firecrawl vs macro-tasks
firecrawl has 197,942 GitHub stars, 10,457 forks, 621 open issues and last shipped yesterday. macro-tasks has 6,083 stars, 566 forks, 100 open issues and last shipped yesterday. firecrawl leads on adoption by 3,154% (197,942 vs 6,083 stars). firecrawl is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; macro-tasks is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. firecrawl has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, macro-tasks 9%. macro-tasks was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai, ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| firecrawl | macro-tasks | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 198K | ★ 6.1K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 10K | ⑂ 566 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick firecrawl if
- You weight community size — 198K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick macro-tasks if
- You want the macro-tasks feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and macro-tasks fits your workflow better
About firecrawl
🔥 Firecrawl The API to search, scrape, and interact with the web at scale. 🔥 The web context API to find sources, extract content, and turn it into clean Markdown or structured data your agents can ship with. Open source and available as a hosted service. Pst. Hey, you, join our stargazers :) Why Firecrawl? Industry leading reliability : Covers 96% of the web, including JS heavy pages — no proxy headaches, just clean data (see benchmarks) Blazingly fast : P95 latency of 3.4s across millions of pages, built for real time agents and dynamic apps LLM ready output : Clean markdown, structured JSON, screenshots…
read the full firecrawl overview →
About macro-tasks
Sign up · Docs · Book demo · Website · Feature requests · Contribute · Hiring Macro is the all in one workspace for you and your team. It unifies email + messages + docs + tasks + agents + CRM into a single fast interface with shared team level memory. Everything in your workspace is @linked and searchable so your team (and your agents) never have to switch tools. Why Macro We built Macro because we wanted a single operating system for our startup. There are many good software products, and we used them all — Slack, Linear, Notion, HubSpot, and Superhuman — but they don't work together as one system. As we…
read the full macro-tasks overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Is firecrawl or macro-tasks more popular?
firecrawl has 197,942 GitHub stars and macro-tasks has 6,083. firecrawl has the larger community by that measure.
Are firecrawl and macro-tasks free?
Both are open source. firecrawl is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and macro-tasks under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between firecrawl and macro-tasks?
firecrawl is written in TypeScript and macro-tasks in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, firecrawl or macro-tasks?
Choose firecrawl if you want the larger community (197,942 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose macro-tasks if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.