head to head · open source

filament vs mediacms

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars, 4,208 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mediacms has 5,113 stars, 957 forks, 146 open issues and last shipped yesterday. filament leads on adoption by 527% (32,075 vs 5,113 stars). filament is written in PHP under MIT; mediacms is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. filament has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, mediacms 19%. mediacms was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filament ★ 32K mediacms ★ 5.1K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

filament mediacms
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 5.1K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in PHP JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 957
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filament if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filament profile →

pick mediacms if

  • You want the mediacms feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and mediacms fits your workflow better

full mediacms profile →

About filament

Filament is a free, MIT licensed UI framework for Laravel, built on Livewire, that gives PHP developers a cohesive set of components for building applications and admin panels quickly.

read the full filament overview →

About mediacms

MediaCMS is a modern, fully featured open source video and media CMS, written in Python/Django and React with a REST API, for anyone who wants to build and run a self hosted small to medium video and media portal.

read the full mediacms overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

hugo vs filament hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

filament vs hugo filament vs Strapi filament vs Payload filament vs halo filament vs wagtail filament vs decap-cms filament vs TinaCMS filament vs frappe filament vs Instatic filament vs OrchardCore filament vs Publii filament vs sanity

Frequently asked questions

Is filament or mediacms more popular?

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars and mediacms has 5,113. filament has the larger community by that measure.

Are filament and mediacms free?

Both are open source. filament is licensed under MIT and mediacms under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filament and mediacms?

filament is written in PHP and mediacms in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filament or mediacms?

Choose filament if you want the larger community (32,075 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose mediacms if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.