head to head · open source

filament vs OrchardCore

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars, 4,208 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OrchardCore has 8,184 stars, 2,598 forks, 854 open issues and last shipped yesterday. filament leads on adoption by 292% (32,075 vs 8,184 stars). filament is written in PHP under MIT; OrchardCore is written in C# under BSD-3-Clause. filament has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, OrchardCore 32%. OrchardCore was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filament ★ 32K OrchardCore ★ 8.2K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

filament OrchardCore
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 8.2K
License MIT BSD-3-Clause
Written in PHP C#
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 2.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filament if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filament profile →

pick OrchardCore if

  • You want the OrchardCore feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and OrchardCore fits your workflow better

full OrchardCore profile →

About filament

Filament is a free, MIT licensed UI framework for Laravel, built on Livewire, that gives PHP developers a cohesive set of components for building applications and admin panels quickly.

read the full filament overview →

About OrchardCore

Orchard Core is an open source, modular, multi tenant application framework and content management system built on ASP.NET Core, for .NET teams that want to build or self host modular web applications and content driven sites under the BSD 3 Clause licence.

read the full OrchardCore overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

hugo vs filament hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

filament vs hugo filament vs Strapi filament vs Payload filament vs halo filament vs wagtail filament vs decap-cms filament vs TinaCMS filament vs frappe filament vs Instatic filament vs Publii filament vs sanity filament vs luban-h5

Frequently asked questions

Is filament or OrchardCore more popular?

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars and OrchardCore has 8,184. filament has the larger community by that measure.

Are filament and OrchardCore free?

Both are open source. filament is licensed under MIT and OrchardCore under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filament and OrchardCore?

filament is written in PHP and OrchardCore in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filament or OrchardCore?

Choose filament if you want the larger community (32,075 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OrchardCore if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.