head to head · open source

hugo vs Payload

hugo has 89,854 GitHub stars, 8,381 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Payload has 44,793 stars, 4,164 forks, 1,127 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hugo leads on adoption by 101% (89,854 vs 44,793 stars). hugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Payload is written in TypeScript under MIT. hugo has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Payload 9%. Payload was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cms, content-management-system), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

hugo ★ 90K Payload ★ 45K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

hugo Payload
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 45K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 8.4K ⑂ 4.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick hugo if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full hugo profile →

pick Payload if

  • You want the Payload feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Payload fits your workflow better

full Payload profile →

About hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go that renders a complete site in seconds, often less, and it is aimed at developers, technical writers, and content teams who build blogs, documentation sites, portfolios, landing pages, and corporate sites as static files.

read the full hugo overview →

About Payload

Payload is an open source, MIT licensed headless CMS and fullstack framework, written in TypeScript and built to run natively inside a Next.js /app folder, aimed at developers who want a TypeScript backend and admin panel without signing up for another SaaS.

read the full Payload overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K gatsby ★ 56K

Related comparisons

hugo vs strapi hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms strapi vs halo next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki lerna vs koreader

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

hugo vs Strapi hugo vs halo hugo vs filament hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms hugo vs TinaCMS hugo vs frappe hugo vs Instatic hugo vs OrchardCore hugo vs Publii hugo vs sanity hugo vs luban-h5

Frequently asked questions

Is hugo or Payload more popular?

hugo has 89,854 GitHub stars and Payload has 44,793. hugo has the larger community by that measure.

Are hugo and Payload free?

Both are open source. hugo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Payload under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between hugo and Payload?

hugo is written in Go and Payload in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, hugo or Payload?

Choose hugo if you want the larger community (89,854 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Payload if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.