head to head · open source

filament vs TinaCMS

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars, 4,208 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. TinaCMS has 13,799 stars, 755 forks, 444 open issues and last shipped yesterday. filament leads on adoption by 132% (32,075 vs 13,799 stars). filament is written in PHP under MIT; TinaCMS is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. filament has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, TinaCMS 5%. filament was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filament ★ 32K TinaCMS ★ 14K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

filament TinaCMS
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 14K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in PHP TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 755
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filament if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filament profile →

pick TinaCMS if

  • You want the TinaCMS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and TinaCMS fits your workflow better

full TinaCMS profile →

About filament

Filament is a free, MIT licensed UI framework for Laravel, built on Livewire, that gives PHP developers a cohesive set of components for building applications and admin panels quickly.

read the full filament overview →

About TinaCMS

TinaCMS is an open source headless content management system for Git based content stored in a user's own GitHub repository. It lives in the TypeScript, React, and Next.js ecosystem and is categorized under Content & Publishing / Content Management Systems. It supports Markdown, MDX, JSON, YAML, and other content formats, with visual editing as a central feature.

read the full TinaCMS overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

hugo vs filament hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

filament vs hugo filament vs Strapi filament vs Payload filament vs halo filament vs wagtail filament vs decap-cms filament vs frappe filament vs Instatic filament vs OrchardCore filament vs Publii filament vs sanity filament vs luban-h5

Frequently asked questions

Is filament or TinaCMS more popular?

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars and TinaCMS has 13,799. filament has the larger community by that measure.

Are filament and TinaCMS free?

Both are open source. filament is licensed under MIT and TinaCMS under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filament and TinaCMS?

filament is written in PHP and TinaCMS in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filament or TinaCMS?

Choose filament if you want the larger community (32,075 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose TinaCMS if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.