head to head · open source

filament vs Instatic

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars, 4,208 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Instatic has 8,691 stars, 802 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. filament leads on adoption by 269% (32,075 vs 8,691 stars). filament is written in PHP under MIT; Instatic is written in TypeScript under MIT. filament has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, Instatic 9%. filament was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

filament ★ 32K Instatic ★ 8.7K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

filament Instatic
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 8.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in PHP TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 4.2K ⑂ 802
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick filament if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full filament profile →

pick Instatic if

  • You want the Instatic feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Instatic fits your workflow better

full Instatic profile →

About filament

Filament is a free, MIT licensed UI framework for Laravel, built on Livewire, that gives PHP developers a cohesive set of components for building applications and admin panels quickly.

read the full filament overview →

About Instatic

Instatic is an MIT licensed, TypeScript built visual CMS that lets designers, developers, and small teams self host their entire website stack — editor, content engine, and publisher — on a single Bun server and publish clean static pages.

read the full Instatic overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

hugo vs filament hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.

filament vs hugo filament vs Strapi filament vs Payload filament vs halo filament vs wagtail filament vs decap-cms filament vs TinaCMS filament vs frappe filament vs OrchardCore filament vs Publii filament vs sanity filament vs luban-h5

Frequently asked questions

Is filament or Instatic more popular?

filament has 32,075 GitHub stars and Instatic has 8,691. filament has the larger community by that measure.

Are filament and Instatic free?

Both are open source. filament is licensed under MIT and Instatic under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between filament and Instatic?

filament is written in PHP and Instatic in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, filament or Instatic?

Choose filament if you want the larger community (32,075 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Instatic if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.