head to head · open source
filament vs comfortable-mexican-sofa
filament has 32,397 GitHub stars, 4,237 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. comfortable-mexican-sofa has 2,706 stars, 616 forks, 47 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. filament leads on adoption by 1,097% (32,397 vs 2,706 stars). filament is written in PHP under MIT; comfortable-mexican-sofa is written in Ruby under MIT. filament has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, comfortable-mexican-sofa 23%. filament was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (cms), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| filament | comfortable-mexican-sofa | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 2.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | PHP | Ruby |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.2K | ⑂ 616 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick filament if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick comfortable-mexican-sofa if
- You want the comfortable-mexican-sofa feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You evaluated both and comfortable-mexican-sofa fits your workflow better
About filament
Build apps & admin panels fast, for your bright ideas. With a solid Laravel foundation and a polished UI, you can focus on what makes your product unique. Filament gives you UI components that you won't outgrow — a cohesive set of well considered building blocks that adapt as your application grows in complexity. Tables — Browse and filter large datasets with powerful columns, actions, and bulk operations. Forms — Build complex, reactive forms using a set of reusable, state aware components. Infolists — Render read only record views with structured layouts and custom formatting. Notifications — Trigger in app…
read the full filament overview →
About comfortable-mexican-sofa
ComfortableMexicanSofa ComfortableMexicanSofa is a powerful Ruby on Rails 5.2+ CMS (Content Management System) Engine Features Simple drop in integration with Rails 5.2+ apps with minimal configuration CMS stays away from the rest of your application Powerful page templating capability using Content Tags Multiple Sites from a single installation Multi Language Support (i18n) (ca, cs, da, de, en, es, fi, fr, gr, hr, it, ja, nb, nl, pl, pt BR, ru, sv, tr, uk, zh CN, zh TW) and page localization. CMS Seeds for initial content population Revision History to revert changes Extendable Admin Area built with Bootstrap 4…
read the full comfortable-mexican-sofa overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is filament or comfortable-mexican-sofa more popular?
filament has 32,397 GitHub stars and comfortable-mexican-sofa has 2,706. filament has the larger community by that measure.
Are filament and comfortable-mexican-sofa free?
Both are open source. filament is licensed under MIT and comfortable-mexican-sofa under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between filament and comfortable-mexican-sofa?
filament is written in PHP and comfortable-mexican-sofa in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, filament or comfortable-mexican-sofa?
Choose filament if you want the larger community (32,397 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose comfortable-mexican-sofa if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.