head to head · open source

Fider vs django-comments-xtd

Fider has 4,530 GitHub stars, 852 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped yesterday. django-comments-xtd has 622 stars, 159 forks, 68 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Fider leads on adoption by 628% (4,530 vs 622 stars). Fider is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; django-comments-xtd is written in HTML under BSD-2-Clause. Fider has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, django-comments-xtd 26%. Fider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Fider ★ 4.5K django-comments-xtd ★ 622 category Community & Social

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Fider django-comments-xtd
GitHub stars ★ 4.5K ★ 622
License AGPL-3.0 BSD-2-Clause
Written in Go HTML
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 852 ⑂ 159
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Fider if

  • You weight community size — 4.5K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Fider profile →

pick django-comments-xtd if

  • You want the django-comments-xtd feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and django-comments-xtd fits your workflow better

full django-comments-xtd profile →

About Fider

Fider is an open source, self hostable feedback portal, written in Go under the AGPL 3.0 licence, that lets a product team collect feature requests and suggestions from its customers and hear directly what they need.

read the full Fider overview →

About django-comments-xtd

django comments xtd is a pluggable Django application that adds threaded, moderated comments to a Django project, and it is intended for Django developers and teams who want a self hosted comment system inside their own application rather than a hosted third party service.

read the full django-comments-xtd overview →

More in Community & Social

Mastodon ★ 50K maigret ★ 38K glance ★ 37K Bluesky ★ 18K Lemmy ★ 15K giscus ★ 12K

Related comparisons

giscus vs fider giscus vs gamedevmind giscus vs alive-progress giscus vs guiadofrontend giscus vs guiadobackend giscus vs artalk giscus vs democracyos giscus vs human-review mastodon vs maigret mastodon vs glance maigret vs glance mastodon vs bluesky mastodon vs lemmy mastodon vs owncast mastodon vs misskey mastodon vs core

More Collaboration & Feedback projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.

Fider vs giscus Fider vs GameDevMind Fider vs alive-progress Fider vs guiadofrontend Fider vs guiadobackend Fider vs Artalk Fider vs democracyos Fider vs human-review Fider vs LogChimp Fider vs helios-server Fider vs Autolab Fider vs mouthful

Frequently asked questions

Is Fider or django-comments-xtd more popular?

Fider has 4,530 GitHub stars and django-comments-xtd has 622. Fider has the larger community by that measure.

Are Fider and django-comments-xtd free?

Both are open source. Fider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and django-comments-xtd under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Fider and django-comments-xtd?

Fider is written in Go and django-comments-xtd in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Fider or django-comments-xtd?

Choose Fider if you want the larger community (4,530 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose django-comments-xtd if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.