head to head · open source

ffsend vs PasswordPusher

ffsend has 7,418 GitHub stars, 205 forks, 33 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. PasswordPusher has 3,202 stars, 460 forks, 105 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ffsend leads on adoption by 132% (7,418 vs 3,202 stars). ffsend is written in Rust under GPL-3.0; PasswordPusher is written in Ruby under Apache-2.0. ffsend has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, PasswordPusher 14%. PasswordPusher was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (encryption, file-sharing, hacktoberfest), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ffsend ★ 7.4K PasswordPusher ★ 3.2K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ffsend PasswordPusher
GitHub stars ★ 7.4K ★ 3.2K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Ruby
Last push 2025-11-20 2026-09-25
Forks ⑂ 205 ⑂ 460
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ffsend if

  • You weight community size — 7.4K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ffsend profile →

pick PasswordPusher if

  • You want the PasswordPusher feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and PasswordPusher fits your workflow better

full PasswordPusher profile →

About ffsend

ffsend is a command line client for the Send file sharing service that uploads and downloads encrypted files and directories through a single terminal command, built for developers, system administrators and anyone who prefers a scriptable, privacy respecting alternative to a web upload form.

read the full ffsend overview →

About PasswordPusher

PasswordPusher is an Apache 2.0 licensed Ruby web application for sharing passwords, notes, files and URLs as self deleting links that expire after a set number of views or a set duration, with audit logs recording who viewed what, and when.

read the full PasswordPusher overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

ffsend vs LocalSend ffsend vs rclone ffsend vs copyparty ffsend vs Files ffsend vs yazi ffsend vs Spacedrive ffsend vs Nextcloud ffsend vs uppy ffsend vs cloudreve ffsend vs superfile ffsend vs ranger ffsend vs Seafile

Frequently asked questions

Is ffsend or PasswordPusher more popular?

ffsend has 7,418 GitHub stars and PasswordPusher has 3,202. ffsend has the larger community by that measure.

Are ffsend and PasswordPusher free?

Both are open source. ffsend is licensed under GPL-3.0 and PasswordPusher under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ffsend and PasswordPusher?

ffsend is written in Rust and PasswordPusher in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ffsend or PasswordPusher?

Choose ffsend if you want the larger community (7,418 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose PasswordPusher if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.