head to head · open source

ffsend vs cryfs

ffsend has 7,414 GitHub stars, 205 forks, 33 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. cryfs has 2,304 stars, 170 forks, 154 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ffsend leads on adoption by 222% (7,414 vs 2,304 stars). ffsend is written in Rust under GPL-3.0; cryfs is written in Rust under LGPL-3.0. ffsend has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, cryfs 7%. cryfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (encryption), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ffsend ★ 7.4K cryfs ★ 2.3K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ffsend cryfs
GitHub stars ★ 7.4K ★ 2.3K
License GPL-3.0 LGPL-3.0
Written in Rust Rust
Last push 2025-11-20 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 205 ⑂ 170
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ffsend if

  • You weight community size — 7.4K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ffsend profile →

pick cryfs if

  • You want the cryfs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and cryfs fits your workflow better

full cryfs profile →

About ffsend

ffsend is a command line client for the Send file sharing service that uploads and downloads encrypted files and directories through a single terminal command, built for developers, system administrators and anyone who prefers a scriptable, privacy respecting alternative to a web upload form.

read the full ffsend overview →

About cryfs

CryFS is a FUSE based cryptographic filesystem written in Rust that encrypts a vault directory so it can be stored safely in cloud services such as Dropbox, iCloud, or OneDrive, and it is intended for Linux users who want their file contents, file sizes, directory structure, and metadata hidden from the storage provider rather than encrypted one file at a time.

read the full cryfs overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

ffsend vs LocalSend ffsend vs rclone ffsend vs copyparty ffsend vs Files ffsend vs yazi ffsend vs Spacedrive ffsend vs Nextcloud ffsend vs uppy ffsend vs cloudreve ffsend vs superfile ffsend vs ranger ffsend vs Seafile

Frequently asked questions

Is ffsend or cryfs more popular?

ffsend has 7,414 GitHub stars and cryfs has 2,304. ffsend has the larger community by that measure.

Are ffsend and cryfs free?

Both are open source. ffsend is licensed under GPL-3.0 and cryfs under LGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ffsend and cryfs?

ffsend is written in Rust and cryfs in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ffsend or cryfs?

Choose ffsend if you want the larger community (7,414 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose cryfs if its feature set, stack or LGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.