head to head · open source

etcd vs risingwave

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars, 10,506 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped today. risingwave has 9,330 stars, 838 forks, 1,687 open issues and last shipped today. etcd leads on adoption by 460% (52,270 vs 9,330 stars). etcd is written in Go under Apache-2.0; risingwave is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. etcd has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, risingwave 9%. risingwave was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

etcd ★ 52K risingwave ★ 9.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

etcd risingwave
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 9.3K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 838
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick etcd if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full etcd profile →

pick risingwave if

  • You want the risingwave feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and risingwave fits your workflow better

full risingwave profile →

About etcd

etcd is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go written distributed key value store that holds the most critical data of a distributed system in a Raft replicated log, aimed at the platform and infrastructure engineers who must keep that control plane data consistent and available.

read the full etcd overview →

About risingwave

RisingWave is an Apache 2.0, Rust written event streaming platform for agentic AI that continuously ingests data from databases, event streams and webhooks, processes it incrementally, and serves fresh results at low latency, and it is aimed at teams building agents, real time applications and streaming data pipelines that need always current, queryable data.

read the full risingwave overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs etcd mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

etcd vs mall etcd vs Prometheus etcd vs NocoDB etcd vs DBeaver etcd vs orm etcd vs Milvus etcd vs TiDB etcd vs drawDB etcd vs typeorm etcd vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager etcd vs Qdrant etcd vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is etcd or risingwave more popular?

etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars and risingwave has 9,330. etcd has the larger community by that measure.

Are etcd and risingwave free?

Both are open source. etcd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and risingwave under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between etcd and risingwave?

etcd is written in Go and risingwave in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, etcd or risingwave?

Choose etcd if you want the larger community (52,270 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose risingwave if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.