head to head · open source
etcd vs oxigraph
etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars, 10,504 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped yesterday. oxigraph has 1,912 stars, 173 forks, 149 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. etcd leads on adoption by 2,634% (52,270 vs 1,912 stars). etcd is written in Go under Apache-2.0; oxigraph is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. etcd has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, oxigraph 9%. etcd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| etcd | oxigraph | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 52K | ★ 1.9K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 11K | ⑂ 173 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick etcd if
- You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick oxigraph if
- You want the oxigraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and oxigraph fits your workflow better
About etcd
etcd is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go written distributed key value store that holds the most critical data of a distributed system in a Raft replicated log, aimed at the platform and infrastructure engineers who must keep that control plane data consistent and available.
About oxigraph
Oxigraph is an open source graph database and an RDF and SPARQL toolkit. It is written in Rust, released under the Apache 2.0 license, and lives in the RDF and SPARQL ecosystem. Its stated goal is to provide a compliant, safe, and fast graph database based on the RocksDB key value store, while also offering utilities for basic RDF manipulation and for building SPARQL implementations.
read the full oxigraph overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is etcd or oxigraph more popular?
etcd has 52,270 GitHub stars and oxigraph has 1,912. etcd has the larger community by that measure.
Are etcd and oxigraph free?
Both are open source. etcd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and oxigraph under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between etcd and oxigraph?
etcd is written in Go and oxigraph in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, etcd or oxigraph?
Choose etcd if you want the larger community (52,270 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose oxigraph if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.